This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
“developing” economies, pre-modern states.
found a common voice and decided to move for-
and an absence of regional cooperation. Even ward in a more coherent manner, more serious
when regional organizations do exist, they are problems were revealed in the southern Medi-
plagued by internal rivalries and paralysis. The terranean. The “Arabs on the southern coasts
Arab Maghreb Union, a regional organization of the Mediterranean were struck by astonish-
bringing together the five Maghreb states, held ment”, in the words of a Tunisian commenta-
its most recent summit in 1994. The League of tor underlining the lack of communication and
Arab States is the largest regional organization, coordination among Arab leaders.
Many Arab
regrouping 22 MENA states, yet its ability to leaders were sceptical about joining a regional
manage and influence regional conflicts effec- organization that could serve as a means of nor-
tively has been questioned on account of the malizing relations with Israel before it had even
deep divisions inside the organization. returned occupied Arab land.
To regulate north-south relations around the To address the complex environmental chal-
Mediterranean, the idea of a Union for the Medi- lenges facing us we need to establish a part-
terranean might have been a suitable forum, a nership linking the two shores of the Medi-
way of opening up “fortress Europe” and find- terranean. Will the Union be this vehicle? We
ing common solutions to common problems. also need better governance, greater political
But this idea has too often been associated with freedom and respect for fundamental human
political ambitions inside the EU and met with rights in the Middle East and North Africa.
suspicion by its Arab neighbours. Support by the Otherwise corrupt regimes that do not rep-
French President Nicolas Sarkozy for a Mediter- resent their constituencies will continue to
ranean Union has given new impetus to the Bar- waste resources instead of investing to solve
celona process, but also created much debate in pressing needs.
Germany feared the French initiative
might be a diversion from the EU Neighbour- The question is still how the two shores of the
hood Policy and a distraction from absorbing Mediterranean should go about collaborating
eastern European countries into the Union. to resolve environmental problems and their
Spain, in turn, thought the French initiative was impact on security when such discrepancies in
perhaps an attempt by a former colonial power political organization and economic capacity
to regain lost ground. But once the EU countries separate them.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52
Produced with Yudu -