The History of the Solheim Cup
The Solheim Cup was founded in 1990, when the sponsor Karsten Manufacturing Corporation
(manufacturers of PING golf equipment) decided that women professional golfers should have an
equivalent event to The Ryder Cup.
The event was named after the company’s founder Karsten Solheim and took the form of a
biennial transatlantic team matchplay competition between European members of the Ladies
European Tour (LET) and the Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA).
The format of the event has evolved over the years. The first event was played at Lake Nona in
Florida with 16 points at stake. Four pairings from each team played in the initial foursomes matches,
which was followed by four more points being played for in the fourball matches. On the final day’s
play the remaining eight points were decided by eight singles matches. Unfortunately for the
Europeans the home side took charge from the start, eventually winning the trophy 11
1
⁄2 - 4
1
⁄2.
Two years later, two more points were introduced to the final day’s singles and the European’s
took their revenge on their American counterparts, winning the tie 11
1
⁄2 - 6
1
⁄2 at Dalmahoy GC in
Scotland.
Back in the USA in 1994, the event developed further, with one more fourball and one extra
foursomes match pushing the total points available up to 20. For the third time the home side was
victorious, with the Americans winning 13 - 7.
In line with the growth in popularity of both of the Tours, eight more matches were introduced
into the event in 1996. Instead of playing one match a day, competitors would play a foursomes
match each of the first two mornings and a fourball in the afternoons. With two extra matches
introduced into the singles, this brought the tally up to 28 for the event and mirrored the men’s
Ryder Cup format.
After two close days at the Marriot St Pierre Hotel and Country Club in Wales, the Americans
clinched the Solheim Cup’s first away victory, winning the singles 10 - 2 and the tie 17 - 11.
The format stayed the same back in the States for the fifth Solheim Cup tie and the Americans
successfully retained the Cup for the third time running, winning the event 16 - 12.
But the event received another modification when it moved to a new 26-point format at
Loch Lomond in 2000. The matches featured four Foursome Matches in the morning of day one,
followed by four in the afternoon. Day two would bring
six Fourball Matches only and in a thrilling final day of 12 singles matches, Europe defied
the critics when they snatched victory from the Americans.
In 2002 at Interlachen GC, the format reverted to the 28-point format to mirror the Ryder
Cup matches as it was in 1996. This format continued in future Solheim Cup matches.
At Interlachen in 2002, the event was full of sudden swings and lead changes, as well as
one of the most closely contested Solheim Cups to date. Europe won three of four morning
foursomes matches on Friday, but the US Team rallied to win three of four four-ball matches in
the afternoon to tie the competition at 4-4 after the first day. The home team’s momentum carried
over into the morning foursome matches on Saturday, where they won three of four matches to
take a 7-5 lead. But the tide turned again in the afternoon as the Europeans swept the four-ball
matches to take a commanding 9-7 lead into the final day.
The U.S. Team, led by Patty Sheehan, showed their strength in the singles matches on Sunday,
winning seven of 12 matches and halving three. Wendy Ward, who took world-number-one Annika
Sorenstam 18 holes, earned a key half-point. In the final match of the day, Rosie Jones clinched
the Cup for the U.S. Team with a par putt on the 15th hole.
Laura Davies earned two points for the European Team and stood as the all-time points’ earner
206 Ladies European Tour 2009
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260