Culture
terns of this siege mentality. Four months “A lot of it’s in the [National Security levels of technological sophistication and
after a handful of fanatical hijackers made Agency], continuing in much more expertise.
good on intentions that old-fashioned secret forms.” “We’ve built our notion of privacy
intelligence-gathering methods had Weinberg of Defense Technology around data itself”—that is, information
Fluxion
detected well before the day that would International, who was much more sym- expressed as numbers or words—“but
come to define his presidency, the Bush pathetic to the goals of the Information with these new technologies, there’s
administration launched the Information Awareness Office, agreed. “Congres- data beyond data,” he said. “The con-
issue
Awareness Office and the Total Informa- sional action didn’t really end TIA,” she structs used in ordinary privacy law just 4
tion Awareness Program through Darpa said. “It just moved to other intelligence don’t work.”
and named Poindexter as the new agencies.” Thwarting complex new forms of
office’s director. Through the grant-making initiatives of electronic surveillance would also require
Poindexter’s tenure was brief. The Darpa, the objectives of the Total Informa- a mass of political will that Tien doesn’t
New York Times first published informa- tion Awareness Program have also contin- expect to see in the current Congress.
tion on the TIA plan to employ informa- ued to thrive in academic settings like the “Even with the Democrats in charge,
tion technologies to engage in vast Inter- Integrated Media Systems Center. everything is geared toward [the presi-
net data-mining operations in February “TIA’s going to happen,” said the dential election in] 2008,” he said. “From
2002, and by November of that year, a former Wyden staffer. “It’s just not going congressional staffs, I haven’t heard
diverse array of activists and commen- to be called TIA, and it might not be the anything about renewing inquiries.”
tators—from the ACLU to conservative government doing it.” Meanwhile, the impulse to cloak an
columnist William Safire—had denounced ever-widening surveillance apparatus in
TIA as the precursor to an Orwellian mass That’s Not My Department secrecy only deepens the odd pairing of
surveillance system. Powell isn’t troubled by what goes paranoia and entitlement in the political
In January 2003, a year after the Infor- on in the heads of apparatchiks at the culture that sustains it.
mation Awareness Office was created— Department of Defense who fund “Consider the position surveillance puts
and after its signature effort was renamed research projects at the Integrated the viewer in,” said Chad Harris, a research
the Terrorism Information Awareness Media Systems Center. In response to fellow in the Department of Communica-
Program—U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold a question about the effect of the Total tion at the University of California, San
(D-Wisconsin) introduced legislation that Information Awareness controversy on Diego, and a contributor to the journal Sur-
eventually suspended TIA activities. the ethical culture of IMSC, he quoted a veillance and Society. “If you’re the viewer,
“The flap over Total Information Aware- line from a song by Tom Lehrer, who in you’re totally dominant over what you’re
ness was mostly a PR problem,” said Sha- 1965 satirized one of the most infamous looking at, like an omniscient being.”
ron Weinberg, editor-in-chief of Defense scientific minds of the Cold War: “‘Once That conclusion may sound overly dra-
Technology International. “The media the rockets go up, who cares where they matic. Well, it is and it isn’t. Recall Pow-
made too big a deal out of it because come down? That’s not my department,’ ell’s remark that, when you’re interacting
Darpa didn’t feel PR was necessary.” says Wernher von Braun.” with a networked electronic environment,
Carole Grunberg, a former legislative In other words, if the military-industrial “You have to assume there’s not a whole
director for Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon)— complex wants to fund research into lot that’s private.”
the privacy-rights watchdog who co-spon- sensory surveillance technologies as well These days, the sweep of that state-
sored the legislation that shut down the as the sophisticated Internet architectures ment includes not just your Social Security
Information Awareness Office—offered a required to make the reach of those number and the content of your e-mail
different perspective on Poindexter’s plan technologies nearly global, why should a but also the pattern of your thoughts and
to turn the Internet into a planet-wide humble university administrator turn down feelings—a state of affairs that makes the
surveillance apparatus. a government grant? prospect of a government obsessed with
“They were just going to turn people That kind of sangfroid is vexing for Lee ferreting out “thought-crime” not nearly
upside down and see what falls out of Tien, a senior attorney for privacy issues difficult enough to imagine.
their pockets,” she said. “Everybody at the Electronic Freedom Foundation, This disturbing fact of modern life
thought this was not something the U.S. an advocacy group that works to protect might cause you to shake your fist at the
should be doing and that it was probably privacy rights on the Internet. Bush administration, but you’ve already
unconstitutional.” “You’re trying to hit a moving target,” looked too far to find the culprit. Like the
Another former Wyden staffer— Tien said. “The research on speech president who has given us such eerily
currently an advisor on national security understanding and sensory surveillance Orwellian-sounding institutions as the
issues to a Democratic presidential can- is most disturbing, but you can’t stop War on Terror and the Department of
didate and who spoke on the condition science. All that stuff is happening at the Homeland Security, a ubiquitous elec-
of anonymity—said that while the legisla- corporate and academic levels, and look- tronic surveillance apparatus intent on our
tion enacted in 2003 stipulated that TIA ing for patterns and making inferences inmost thoughts is the creature—not the
activities were not to be dispersed to serves a dual purpose, both commercial creator—of our collective American neu-
other agencies, information aggregation and surveillance.” rosis. The best way to alter the course of
and data-mining have simply become Tien said that it’s possible to ensure our surveillance society is for everyone to
more deeply shrouded operations within that new information technologies aren’t get wise to the things that a super-cooled
the Department of Defense. used by the government for surveillance quantum mainframe already knows: that
“The overall goal of the program did purposes, but doing so would require we Americans are really scared, really
not end,” the former Wyden staffer said. congressional staffs to develop very high angry, and very easily distracted.
93
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236