search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INSTALLATION F


ibre optic cable assemblies are widely used because of their ease of installation. Te connectors we use on the fibre optic cable


assemblies are easy to connect and disconnect for new installations and maintenance of our optical networks. Connector types, including the SC, LC and


MPO, are mechanically stable and reliable. Te polishing processes used for terminating the fibre optic connectors have experienced many advancements over the past five years to improve the reflectance and alignment process for geting some of the lowest losses as the light signal travels through a mated connector pair. Te one constant that holds true to all fibre


optic connectors is the importance of the surface quality of the fibre optic connector end-face. Scratches, embedded dust particles and residues in the contact zone of a mated connector pair will disrupt the path through which the light travels, as it crosses out of the transmiting connector’s end-face into the receiving connector’s end-face. Te best way to get optimal performance from fibre optic connections is to proactively inspect and clean both ends of a mated connector pair.


Time constraints Tere most common reason cited on why many in the industry do not have a proactive approach to inspection and cleaning fibre optic connectors is, ‘I do not have time to do that.’ Tere is a misconception that taking the time to inspect and clean every end-face during a network inspection project would be too time consuming, which drives up the installation costs. Let’s take a look at an example to determine


the impact of time and potential cost of undertaking a fibre installation project connecting 288-fibre from a centrally located server to six different locations throughout a building. Each remote location will have two 24-fibre cable assemblies going through the indoor conduit in a normal seting and will run 45m. To do a 100 per cent inspection for each connector for both ends of a mated connector pair in this type of installation would require the inspection of 1,152 end-faces in total. According to the National Electrical


Contractors Association (NECA) Manual of Labor Units, it would take five man-hours to pull each 24-fibre cable assembly 30m in normal conditions. For the sake of this case, we will assume the installation will happen under normal conditions. Te installation would increase by 25 per cent or more in difficult conditions. It will take the installation team seven-and-a-half hours to run each of our 24-fibre cable assemblies. Since there are two cable assemblies going to six different locations, the total amount of time to run all 12 of the cable assemblies is 90 man-hours using NECA labour units.


Fibre Yearbook 2020


And repeat Doing a 100 per cent inspection for all of the end-faces of a 288-fibre installation comes out to 1,152 end-faces. Tis equates to four end-faces per fibre since the installation will need to be at the end-faces on end one and end two of the assembly, plus the in-adapter end-faces inside panel one and panel two. Te installer in our example is going to use an automated inspection soſtware that comes with the inspection scope to help with this process. One advantage of using inspection scopes with a quality inspection soſtware is the elimination of human subjectivity and ensured repeatability for making a judgement, if the surface quality of the end-face in the critical contact zone is acceptable and does not increase the signal loss. Most of the inspections scopes available on


the market come with the inspection soſtware set to the visual pass/fail criteria from the industry standard IEC 61300-3-35. Another key advantage of using inspection scopes with inspection soſtware is being able to create reports documenting the end-face quality, which include the option to enter reference values for identifying the specific connector that underwent the inspection at the time inspected. Most of the reports generated by the


inspection soſtware provide a time stamp to document the precise time when the inspection took place using a process that takes two seconds. Te total time needed to do a 100 per cent inspection of all 1,152 end-faces to the IEC 61300-3-35 standard using an inspection scope with the automated inspection soſtware would take the installation team an extra 38.4 minutes. Te 100 per cent inspection of all 1,152 end-faces increases the project time 0.7 per cent going from the original 90 hours planned to 90 hours and 40 minutes.


Safe travels Physical contact fibre optic connectors like the LC, SC and MPO depend on a spring located inside the connector body, behind the ferrule, to create a contact force when two connectors are mated. Tis creates a highly-stable situation for light to travel with minimal disruptions as it exits the transmiting connector into the receiving connector. Te strong contact force also prevents dust


particle migration from entering into the contact region of a mated connector pair. If an installer does decide to skip the proactive inspection and cleaning step and one of the connector end-faces has some contamination, it will create problems. Dust particles that are caught in between a mated connector pair will embed into the surface of both connectors. Tis dust becomes a permanent defect in the surface, that is no longer removable. When this happens,





The one constant that holds true to all fibre optic connectors is the importance of the surface quality of its end-face”


the only solution is to replace both ends of the connector pair, which will drive up the cost of the installation to correct the damaged end-faces. Te costs associated with skipping the inspection and cleaning process are avoidable and will end up extending the project longer and require the purchase of replacement components to correct the damage. If the decision is made to splice on replacement


assemblies, the repair will be the cost of the two pigtail assemblies plus the labour of installation testing. Te NECA labour units for doing a single strand splice is 0.3, which is about 18 minutes. Te NECA labour units for installing an anaerobic field install connector is 0.25, or 15 minutes per end. Te installer will need to carry out some basic testing to ensure the replacement of the two damaged end-faces are working.


Te light side Te NECA lists 0.2 labour units for continuity testing with a light source and 0.3 labour units for doing a single wavelength bi-directional test using an optical power meter and light source. Te replacement connectors, plus the additional 30 to 40 minutes geting the replacement connectors – along with 30 additional minutes of testing – far exceeds the amount of time it would have taken to proactively complete the 100 per cent inspection. A proactive 100 per cent process of inspecting


each end-face would have also avoided other expenses, such as dealing with frustrated customers, paying for truck roll-backs, expedited freight for replacement parts, or paying overtime expenses for fixing problems. Te excuse, ‘I do not have time to do that’ is someone not thinking things through. Tere was a basketball coach who used to ask his players, ‘If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?’ John Wooden has passed away, but wisdom lives on. n


Brian Teague is a member of the Electronics Technicians Association (ETA) and the Building Industry Consulting Service International (BICSI)


19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32