search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sponsored article


Who wants an Apple the size of Australia?


Andy Peach, principal consultant at Aon Equity markets have had it easy for 10 years.


Since the nadir of the financial crisis in 2009, investors have enjoyed strong equity returns – the MSCI World has grown by around 15% a year in local currency terms during the past 10 years. With equity indices providing returns like that, it has been hard for active man- agers to demonstrate added value so it’s easy to see why passive investment has grown in popularity.


Cumulative fund flows (US$bns)


-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3


2008 2009 2010 Equity Passive 2011 2012 Equity Active Sources: BIS, Lipper 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


In the same period, global investment in passive equity management has grown by $2.3trn, while active investments have shrunk by $2.5trn, and these passive investors have been rewarded with “easy” money. We have now entered a transitional phase in global markets, from a period where risky assets have per- formed well to one where volatility is likely to remain elevated.


An Apple the size of Australia Passive investing provides exposure to a great many stocks, but it is not necessarily true that passive investors enjoy great diversification. Market cap indices have high levels of stock concentration in the largest companies. For example, the top 10 holdings of the MSCI World (c.13% of the index) have the same weight as the smallest 877 stocks in the index.


The global market is just as dependent on a few companies as it is on entire nations with large econo- mies. The index weighting of US tech firm Apple alone is the size of Australia. This is not necessarily a problem if you have consciously decided on this allocation but, by definition, most passive investors have not. In Q4 2018, the MSCI World experienced its largest quarterly drawdown (-13%) in seven years. A size- able portion of this, approximately one-sixth, can be attributed to the top 10 companies, which make up less than 1% of the number of stocks in the index. Markets have clearly regained some composure in the first half of 2019, but volatility spiked again in May, with major US tech firms leading market losses. But there are likely to be further headwinds. This could well be the start of a sustained period of volatility from which passive investors have no place to hide.


22 September 2019 portfolio institutional roundtable: Factor investing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36