Sponsored article
The link between ESG and performance
Masja Zandbergen, head of sustainability integration at Robeco
– Companies that adhere to ESG principles outperform those who do not – Link with better risk-adjusted investment returns is backed by wealth of research
– This is not an exact science, though, and data scarcity and interpreta- tion matter
Robeco has long believed in the benefits of sustainable investing. We are convinced that using financially-material environmental, social and govern- ance (ESG) information in our investment processes leads to better-informed
investment decisions and better risk-adjusted returns in the long run.
This belief is supported by a growing body of evidence. A good example is the meta-study on the relationship between ESG and performance, “From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustain- ability Can Drive Financial Outperformance”.1
This paper examined more than 200 sources – including
academic research, industry reports, newspaper articles and books – and concluded that “80% of the reviewed studies demonstrate that prudent sustainability practices have a positive influence on invest- ment performance”.
Another research project looked at the universe of 2,250 academic studies published on the subject since 1970, using data spanning four decades until 2014. It concluded that ESG made a positive con- tribution to corporate financial performance in 62.6% of meta-studies and produced negative results in only 10% of cases (the remainder were neutral).2
More narrowly defined studies also confirm this positive link. One study, for instance, shows that com- panies with stronger shareholder rights enjoyed higher valuations, profits and sales growth, had lower capital expenditures, and made fewer acquisitions.3 efficiency outperform their counterparts.4
Another noted that companies with a high eco-
An interesting stream of research focuses on the financial pay-off of engagements by investors. A study of more than 600 publicly-listed US companies showed that, after successful engagement, firms’ investment returns were on average higher than would have been expected without the engagement. It also found that after successful engagement, companies experienced improvements in their operating performance, profitability and governance.5
Why are some still skeptical? Despite the plethora of positive evidence, there nevertheless is some lingering skepticism about whether sustainability adds value. One of the main reasons for this is that the concept of sustainable investing is a broad one. For instance, some investors simply wish to avoid certain companies because of a mismatch in values. Much of the early academic work focused on these values-based exclusion policies.6
1) Clark, G.L., Feiner, A., and Viehs, M., 2014, “From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustainability Can Drive Financial Outper- formance”, SSEE Research Report. 2) Deutsche Asset and Wealth Management, 2015, “ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: Mapping the global landscape”. 3) Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L. and Metrick, A., 2003, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118(1), pp. 107-155.
4) Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., and Koedijk, K., 2005, “The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle”, Financial Analyst Journal Vol 61(2), pp. 51-63. 5) Zhang, L., 2017, “The financial return of responsible investing”, Sustainable Pension Investment Lab. 6) Harrison, H. and Kacperczyk, M., 2009, “The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 93(1), pp. 15-36.
28 November 2019 portfolio institutional roundtable: Responsible investing
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
