search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The Big Picture THE BIG PICTURE: LACK OF INVESTOR APPETITE WARNS OF THINGS TO COME


Asset inflows hit five-year low $40.000.000 $2.750.000 $35.000.000 $2.250.000 $30.000.000 $1.750.000 $25.000.000 $20.000.000 $15.000.000 $10.000.000 $5.000.000 $0 $1.250.000 $750.000 $250.000 -$250.000 -$750.000 -$1.250.000


Last reported institutional AUM Sum of product-level net outflows


Institutional AUM Net flow


Sum of product-level net inflows Absolute net flow Source: eVestment


If the past is an indicator of the future, then tough times lie ahead, finds Andrew Holt.


The level of asset outflows in the final quarter of 2021 have not been seen since the financial crisis, giving a clear indication of where investors think we are heading. As a further indicator, on an absolute basis, global large cap core equity strategies witnessed their largest outflows since 2005, a few years before the financial crisis exploded. Furthermore, the volume of asset movement as a proportion of reported assets in Q4 is in-line with the lowest levels seen dur- ing the past five years (see graph).


The primary reason was the low volume of inflows to tradi- tional non-cash strategies. On an absolute basis, it was the lowest since mid-2018 through mid-2019, but as a propor- tion of reported assets it was the lowest level of the past five years.


This point, combined with the relatively large proportional allocations to cash in Q4, gives an indication that investors were extremely cautious – or even worried – about committing capital to traditional strategies entering 2022. Caution also prevailed in the two largest inflow drivers in Q4 – US passive core and global emerging market passive fixed income – a highly defensive coupling of investments. Putting these inflows into a historical context, the amounts allocated would not have been placed within the five largest inflows in the prior quarter – yet another indication of the low volume of allocations during the quarter.


While it was not enough to drive overall inflows, preferences remained for fixed income strategies: with seven of the 10 larg- est inflow universes being fixed income-focused. All this adds up to a grim asset allocation picture. And, it could be noted, given the uncertainty and drive south in global mar- kets, a warning sign of things to come.


Issue 113 | May 2022 | portfolio institutional | 9


Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020 Q1 2021 Q2 2021 Q3 2021 Q4 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60