Industry view – Association of Member Nominated Trustees
So, a new professional trustee accredita- tion was introduced. The next question was, should there be an equivalent for lay trustees?
Janice Turner is co-chair of the Association of Member Nominated Trustees (AMNT)
LAY TRUSTEES: A QUALIFIED SUCCESS
There’s never a dull moment in pensions if you are a lay trustee. If it is not The Pensions Regulator’s introduction of a new Single Code, it’s the new statutory guidance for schemes on managing cli- mate risk. Then you have the govern- ment (again) trying to get pension schemes to put their money where the government’s mouth is and invest in a range of UK endeavours (if they want us to do this they could at least give us a proper incentive to do so!). So, for a trustee it is obviously impor- tant to keep up with developments, understand how they impact on your scheme and decide as a board how to respond. Trustee knowledge and under- standing is as important now as it has ever been.
It is not just important for lay trustees: The Pensions Regulator recognised that there needed to be some kind of quality mark for professional trustees. Having extensive professional knowledge of one aspect of pensions, as many do, does not necessarily guarantee the equivalent pro- fessional trustee knowledge.
The AMNT agreed with the Pensions Management Institute (PMI) that there should, and we were delighted last year when the PMI launched its new lay trus- tees’ accreditation. In order to become accredited, lay trustees have to do the same as their professional equivalents – complete The Pension Regulator’s Trus- tee Toolkit and pass the same two exams. Trustee knowledge and understanding has been a consistent theme throughout AMNT’s 11 years of existence. It is clear that the deeper the understanding trus- tees have of the governance of their pen- sion schemes, the better run
those
schemes will be. Over the years we have assisted our members by holding group study sessions of modules of the trustee toolkit, and we have assisted the regulator during periods when they are revising the toolkit or seeking views and feedback on how it works. We have also worked with the PMI and our industry partners to run training for our members on the PMI’s Level 3 award in pension trusteeship, which is now unit one of the accreditation exams, and held special sittings of the exam in those sunlit days before Covid where everyone would gather to take the exam in the same room. So, what is stopping some lay trustees from becoming accredited? One issue that we have heard from AMNT members in the past has been a reluctance of scheme sponsors or schemes to pay the not-insubstantial fees for taking these exams. As most lay trustees are not paid
anything but expenses for taking on the considerable work and legal responsibility that goes with trusteeship, encouraging and paying for them to take exams should be a given. If a company executive had an extremely expensive company car, they would make sure the only people who could go near it were suitably qualified. The value of the car looks like a Lego toy compared to the value of the pension scheme so they should view in that con- text the need to support trustees in time and in achieving qualifications. Time is, of course, the other essential fac- tor: it is vital that trustees are allowed suf- ficient time away from their day jobs not only to prepare for their board meetings, including time to read a dozen or more papers, but also to further their knowl- edge and understanding. For my part, I was delighted the other week to receive notification that I had passed my exams and qualified to become one of the first lay trustees to receive accreditation from the PMI. I would urge fellow trustees to take a look and if you, like me, have not sat an exam in decades, be assured that it is not as appalling a prospect as you might imagine. The PMI is as helpful as it can be. Its website has a comprehensive reading list and you can download examples of the kind of multi- ple-choice questions you will be faced with.
It is clear that many, many fellow lay trus- tees perform their role perfectly well with- out the need to prove it by attaining accreditation. But in these days of grow- ing complexity in the pensions world, attaining a recognised qualification can only be to the good.
Publisher portfolio Verlag Office 5.08 – 5th floor Fleet House 8 –12 New Bridge Street London EC4V 6AL +44 (0)20 7822 8522
london@portfolio-verlag.com
Editor Mark Dunne
m.dunne@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Deputy editor Mona Dohle
m.dohle@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Senior writer Andrew Holt
a.holt@portfolio-institutional.co.uk 10 | portfolio institutional | March 2022 | issue 111
Publisher John Waterson
j.waterson@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Head of sales Clarissa Huber
c.huber@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Business development manager Basit Mohammed
b.mohammed@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Head of roundtables Mary Brocklebank
m.brocklebank@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Marketing executive Hannah Carry
h.carry@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56