search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature – Selecting an asset manager


PICKING A CHAMPION


One of the central relationships in the balletic performance of a pension scheme is that between a fund’s chief investment officer and its external asset managers. Their carefully choreo- graphed investment dance should, all going according to plan, produce a performance of rare beauty. Surrey Pension Fund is currently conducting a review of its asset managers. It testifies to the importance of the relation- ship that a review is not to be executed at a rushed pace. According to Neil Mason, head of pensions at Surrey Pension Fund, the object of the review is for the scheme to establish all the metrics that fit into the fund’s overall risk analysis. Risk and how much to take, has always been at the heart of investment decision making. Yet the concept itself has evolved over time.


“Whereas before we looked at currency risk and political risk, now we are more holistic and will also look at ESG risk,” Mason says. “We are also looking to see that the risks are consistent with the return profile of the scheme.”


Risk is justified by return and is the basis on which asset man- agers are ultimately assessed. However, different pensions take different approaches to the question of the best way to measure asset manager performance. While Surrey Pension Fund sets a performance target for asset managers, who must meet the fund’s discount rate, the Centrica Pension Fund has what its chief investment officer, Chetan Ghosh, describes as a “differentiated approach” to tar- gets. The fund eschews setting targets and benchmarks for its asset managers to meet. “We uncover managers who have their own process that they will not change for any client; it’s up to us to buy into that pro- cess through thick and thin,” Ghosh says.


30 | portfolio institutional February 2020 | issue 90


Want to find an outperforming asset manager? Catherine Lafferty explains how.


“We will find our own ways of tracking whether that manager has done well over time but do not set them targets. A massive problem in the investment management community is when people unduly constrain their managers to overly focus on an index or outperformance target without actually focusing on best cumulative return outcomes,” he adds. Surrey Pension Fund sets each of its asset managers their own discrete targets. Mason agrees that there are limits to the utility of benchmarks but believes they can assist individual manag-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46