PI Partnership – Cambridge Associates


WHATEVER IT TAKES: A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO TARGETING NET ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS


As society in general has become aware of the need to decarbonise the economy and the way we live, investors have been con- sidering how they should respond. Such a transformation will require massive investments in new assets while making others obsolete or impermissible. It will require new technologies and business models to be rolled out. Institutional in- vestors have a pivotal role to play in this reallocation of resources; their motiva- tions can and should be twofold: – The social imperative to contribute to this change


– The investment imperative not to be caught on the wrong side of history A holistic portfolio response to climate change must address: – What you don’t invest in – What you do invest in – What you ask of the companies (and managers) you invest in.


At Cambridge Associates we don’t believe in dichotomies such as ‘divest or engage?’ Different tools are right for different parts of the portfolio, to avoid bad investments, find good ones, and decarbonise the economy. Since carbon is ubiquitous across every economy, every sector and company will need to change. Being an active share- holder – engaging - on climate topics is therefore important; if companies do not change, the Paris targets can never be met, whatever we own, or avoid, or divest


Passive:


Focus on tilts and engagement/voting


from. This means supporting climate related resolutions and voting against boards who are not delivering. This approach is appropriate for the broad range of businesses whose emissions arise from their consumption of fossil fu- els, but what about the producers, the oil, gas and coal sectors?


A common argument against divestment from fossil fuel companies says that the investor loses influence which could oth- erwise persuade them to adopt low car- bon transition plans. But how viable is it to lobby firms to plan their own run- down? The fossil fuel sector is a problem that will solve itself if the rest of the econ- omy – its customers – succeed in making the low carbon transition. Divestment from fossil fuels is not solely an ideologi- cal position, as it is sometimes painted, but can simply be a logical and consistent investment decision. Why invest in a sec- tor your engagement seeks to under- mine? That you hope will disappear? Engagement and divestment alone will not protect a portfolio from the full costs of a low carbon transition, nor will they help seize the opportunities. Carbon should be treated as a business risk in all investment decisions. Asset owners should require their managers to incorpo- rate this into their decisions, avoiding or tilting away from businesses which have high emissions or no credible plan for re- duction and searching out those with assets or technologies that can profitably eliminate emissions. From a portfolio perspective, a lot can be achieved with modest effort. Carbon


Active:


Integration of climate risk, active ownership


Engage mainly here


Seek forward momentum on climate alignment


Don’t own these


Hi


Fossil Fuel Producers


Emission Intensity


Carbon Consumers/Emitters (This is most of the market)


36 | portfolio institutional | February 2021 | issue 100 Low


Positive Solutions


Buy more of these


VC, growth capital, renewable infra


emissions are concentrated in a handful of businesses in a handful of sectors. Tak- ing the MSCI ACWI index of global equi- ties as an example, 22% of emissions came from only 10 companies, and in active portfolios we have found this pro- portion much higher, often over 75%. it is often possible to reduce a portfolio’s implied emissions dramatically by rela- tively modest changes.


Despite the above, it is hard, today, to build a zero-emission diversified portfo- lio. Significant technical challenges will have to be overcome for complete decar- bonisation in some sectors; there will be a rump of very hard to avoid emissions. Purchased offsets are increasingly viewed with scepticism. Instead, it is possible to make market-return investments in, for example, renewable power, and compute with reasonable robustness the emissions avoided given the capacity ‘displaced’. This, however, is only a reasonable approach if you are making primary investments in genuinely incremental capacity. Buying existing renewable assets displaces nothing. Asset owners who support decarbonising the economy, while protecting their port- folio from the costs of transition, need a comprehensive framework for evaluating and engaging with their investment man- agers. This can be based on the following elements of strategy: – Divest from fossil fuel producers – Reduce exposure to highly emitting companies


– Engage with companies to improve transition plans


– Invest in climate solutions, both techno- logical and infrastructural


– Allow for ‘carbon avoided’ through primary investments in renewable capacity


– Monitor progress of both current emis- sions and their estimated pathway.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48