Sponsored article


Passing the LDI baton to the new generation of CDI


Julien Halfon, head of pension solutions at BNP Paribas Asset Management


The widespread adoption of liability-driven investing (LDI) was one of the few success stories to have emerged from the financial crisis. By mapping out what pension funds need to pay and investing more than 30% of their assets in LDI, many of them have closely matched their liabilities and assuage fears of under-funding held by corporate sponsors.


But with this success came a new problem. While on paper, pension fund liabilities are matched, the LDI approach has created a new headache. Some 85% of UK pension schemes claim to be cash-flow negative, right when they


need to be generating more cash than ever.


Most pension funds in the UK are closed to new joiners and future accrual of existing members. This means that for many there is no new money coming into the pot. At the same time, the membership is maturing and the level of benefit payments they require is rapidly increasing. Without new money com- ing in to be recycled and passed through, trustees look to sponsors to increase contributions or to their investments to provide additional cash-flow. Due to the nature of the investments held in an LDI strategy, this cash is not easy to find.


The yields on gilts, the main holdings in physical LDI portfolios, have fallen into negative territory on a real, long-term basis. Other LDI approaches that use a complex web of derivatives and swap contracts may offset this drag from gilts, but with rising interest rates on the horizon, expensive collateral calls may be needed to service the leverage they use. This means just keeping liabilities matched might require significant cash.


Pension funds do have options: cashing in their LDI strategies in favour of more simple and liquid instru- ments that can be sold to free up the money needed to pay pensions, for example. The problem here is that many of these assets slipped up pension investors a decade ago – and few relish the thought of it happening again. Equities, for instance, are easy to sell when cash is needed, but their volatility – espe- cially when markets might be reaching the end of a record bull-run – make them an unattractive choice for prudent trustees running off their funds.


Some fixed income instruments, aside from expensive gilts, could provide pension funds with options. But credit, which soared after the crisis, has been another tremendous success, meaning the upside investors once gained from holding these relatively risky assets has been squeezed and now offers lim- ited potential for income over what they might expect from gilts.


Real estate and infrastructure equity have become expensive as the market is aware of the high demand for these assets from income-hungry investors. Also, their limited liquidity does not make them ideal targets for pension funds coming to the tail end of their maturity.


The good news is that there is another option.


18 March 2019 portfolio institutional roundtable: CDI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32