search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVICE CORNER


In the past four years family offi ces have been consistently over-optimistic about their future investment performance when contributing to The Global Family Offi ce Report. Is behavioural fi nance the answer to more effective forecasts or should they put more effort into predicting other indicators? Nicholas Moody reports


F


orecasting the future is a poisoned chalice. Just ask Michael Fish. In 1987 the then BBC weatherman infamously


assured the British public there was no hurricane approaching southern England “but it would be very windy in Spain”. That weather event became known


as the Great Storm of 1987—the most destructive since 1703—which left 18 people dead and caused damage that when


24 CAMPDENFB.COM


converted into a 2017 equivalent totalled £5 billion ($6.6 billion). Fish continued to serve as a forecaster at


the UK Met Office until 2004 however, the term “Michael Fish moment” entered in to British popular culture and has been applied to public forecasts, on any topic, which turn out to be embarrassingly wrong. While the consequences of investment


forecasting doesn’t result in danger to life and limb, collectively family offices


ISSUE 72 SUPPLEMENT | 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32