G Food security
Farming subsidies have been cut by a third by the government since Britain left the EU. Meanwhile, hundreds of
farmers have left the land. But Charlie Clutterbuck, veteran Unite food activist and campaigner has a plan to revive farming and rural areas that includes making home produced food more affordable.
Back in 2017, 175,000 farmers and landowners received £3.5bn in individual payments from the Basic Payment Scheme of the Common Agricultural Policy. (CAP) It was a figure Boris Johnson “guaranteed” would be maintained if Britain left Europe. He later changed his mind when his government announced in July 2020 a complete phaseout of Basic Farm Payouts by 2027.
Unite’s Charlie Clutterbuck, a soil scientist and food security expert was never a big CAP fan, mainly because big landowners were creaming off large sums of cash for themselves. UK land ownership is the most unequal in Europe. Our leaders like that. When the EU planned to limit CAP to £250,000 annually for any one farmer, Prime Minster David Cameron was quickly on his way to Brussels to successfully block the limit being introduced.
Before and after the EU referendum, Michael Gove ran round ‘promising the earth’ to farmers and many environmental groups were supportive. But like everything Gove touches there was no real plan and it was thrown out by the 2019-20 agriculture minister George Eustice.
“All the ‘green’ ideas were complex, especially for small farmers. Even Michael Heseltine said they were OK for his farms as he had management systems, but hopeless for small farmers who knew best how to breed cows and sheep. The government department had a bad track record on paying out BPS – being fined heavily by EU for incompetence, when all they had to do was count static land.
Anything that moved was going to be too complex,” explains Charlie. The transition out of CAP between 2021 and 2027 is now taking place under the Environment Land Management Schemes (ELMS) that are according to DEFRA, ‘designed to contribute to our range of objectives – farming and nature can and must go hand in hand to support resilient food
production and farm businesses, and to achieve our target outcomes for environment and climate.’
ELMS funding is being allocated under three strands; Landscape Recovery Scheme (LRS), Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) and the Countryside Stewardship Plus (CSP) scheme.
Each strand was originally planned to receive £1bn. But ‘the environment’ means an awful lot of different things. PM Johnson said in the Commons, “What we are going to do is use the new freedoms we have after leaving the CAP to support farmers to beautify the countryside.”
According to Charlie, “This view of a romanticised countryside is nothing new. But it does not improve the sustainability of present-day UK farming in terms of energy intensive chemical inputs and dependence on other people’s land and labour.”
To be eligible to claim for the LRS you must have a spare 1,000 acres (500ha) – basically for re-wilding or carbon trading. Meanwhile, small farms are only able to directly access the SFI. Recently released figures reveal that under ELMS in 2022-23 the total sum spent was £2.230bn.
“This is over a third less than Johnson’s original promise,” laments Clutterbuck. “Direct payments to 84,000 farmers, including 865 who have left the industry during the year, are £1.4bn.
“Payments under Environment Land management, including CSP, towards 39,000 farmers total just £572m. And as this figure also includes SFI then I can only conclude that this backs up what many farmers have told me that very few are applying,” explains Clutterbuck.
“One MP should be putting down a Commons question to find out exactly where these subsidies are now going and who is doing well. I predict the winners are not only large landowners but ‘environmental consultants’, working for ‘the City’ and now adept with the new language of ‘carbon trading’ and ‘biodiversity net gain’.
Charlie wants the £3.5bn that used to come from CAP to help address the big food issues of today. Food banks are at their most numerous, as more people find themselves in food poverty – a term
23 uniteLANDWORKER Spring 2024
n By Mark Metcalf
the government won’t recognise. Over 27 per cent of people are now obese. Cheap ultra-processed food makes up 57 per cent of the British diet, more than any other country.
One simple suggestion by the soil scientist is to grow and eat more home-grown fruit and vegetables. This would revive UK horticulture.
Clutterbuck feels particularly concerned about this, as he was sponsored by the government’s Fruit Research Station. There, the director proclaimed how fruit growing was an emblem of ‘Britishness’ – think of the Vale of Evesham and the Garden of Kent.
“That ideal is being lost to cheap overseas produce. Fruit growing was never subsidised, but should be. We should be having a much broader debate about the role of UK food and farming and how resilient we are to worldwide events, such as the conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East and the Red Sea, plus events such as Brexit.”
These subsidies could be redirected towards a scheme adopted by the United States where their Farm Bill pays over $60bn annually to around 40m poorer people to help them buy healthier food cheaply.
While fiscal conservatives argue against the initiative, most Republicans and Democrats like it. It helps the Democrats address food poverty and build local economies, and the Republicans like it because it helps their farming base with their continuous overproduction problem.
“Such a scheme here could be combined with specific general projects consisting of renovating social housing and community facilities. People in rural areas would vote for such a programme,” Clutterbuck concludes.
“
One MP should be putting down a Commons question to find out exactly where these subsidies are going and who’s doing well. I predict the winners are not only large landowners but ‘environmental consultants’, working for the City
Charlie Clutterbuck, Unite campaigner
”
Getty Images
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
