38
feature
doors, windows, glazing & hardware
addressing security challenges with multi-performance door systems
Rob Mottram, Head of Product and Compliance at steel door manufacturer Robust UK, discusses the importance of achieving recognised security testing standards, while also aligning with wider building performance requirements...
As buildings often need to balance accessibility with security, doors are no longer seen as a simple access point. More now than ever, they are expected to function as a multi-performing solution capable of resisting attack, supporting compliance, enabling safe daily operation and maintaining long-term performance under constant use. In educational environments where the security of pupils, teachers and property are essential, there is a challenge in doors achieving this whilst providing long-term performance. Understanding security ratings A door’s security performance is defined through independent testing and certification processes, with security standards establishing clear criteria for how door systems perform under different forms of attack.
Depending on the classification level
required, security doors are tested for static load resistance under sustained force, dynamic impact to replicate kicks or blunt- force attacks, timed manual attack using a range of tools, and mechanical endurance testing to assess long-term performance. PAS 24 is the minimum standard for assessing a door’s resistance to forced entry using realistic attack methods, supporting compliance with Approved Document Q of Building Regulations. The Loss Prevention Certification Board (LPCB) issues the LPS 1175 security rating standard, which classifies doorsets based on their tested resistance to forced and sophisticated break-in attempts. Ratings from SR1 to SR8 demonstrate varying levels of protection and resistance to advanced attack methods, with SR2 to SR4-rated doors being the most commonly specified.
Doors which meet this security standard can also achieve Secured by Design approval, a recognised police security initiative ensuring doors meet a high
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
