FOOD & BEVERAGE
system should be able to verify 100% of the data on 100% of the products against validated source production data. Typically via the factory MRP system, not from a production line operative. As well as guaranteeing its accuracy, having this complete audit trail provides proof that all data or labels are verified.
ADDRESSING FOOD WASTE A study by climate action NGO WRAP titled “Quantification of food surplus, waste and related materials in the UK grocery supply chain” calculated that approximately 1.7 million tonnes of food were wasted in the UK prior to it reaching the consumer, almost half of which was preventable. A further study by Rentokil determined that mislabelling was the second most common cause of food recalls in the US, and the third in the UK. A well-designed label verification system would be able to detect not only that an incorrect label was being used but also any incorrect data necessitating a recall.
Food labelling errors fall in to two categories, systematic errors, and random errors. A systematic error is where the label and/or data is manifestly incorrect. Random errors are generally a problem relating to the vagaries of the production process, such as a foreign body becoming attached to a printer. Label verification facilitates this full end of line automation and is critical to the whole quality control picture. JentonDimaco label verification systems are the only ones that meet all UK labelling requirements and provide the data to prove it.
STAY RIGHT SIDE OF LABELLING LAWS
Almost all aspects of food production are subject to strict legal and customer compliance regulations.
JentonDimaco’s advanced optical character recognition (OCR) software reliably scans up to 200 pack labels p/m
Food labelling requires that many parameters must be checked, from the basics of is it the correct packaging, to the more complex of weights, prices and country of origin. Typically, this information is recorded at intervals (often every 30-60 minutes) on paper check sheets with labels then affixed as proof. Companies that have stuck with a manual approach to label verification are often tethered to a system that generates little, if any, benefit to themselves over and above meeting their compliance obligations.
A fully automated label verification system should offer several benefits over a manual system. • 100% of the data is verified • 100% of the packs are verified
• The label data is verified against a known correct standard • Both systematic errors (incorrect data) and random errors (e.g., misplaced label / missing label / print head contamination) are captured. Additionally, these systems provide: • Proof of compliance • Facilitates fast audit responses • Tracks manual overrides against individual user and time/date • Easily allows the data to be fed back as part of continuous improvement programs. An automatic label verification system should provide the data not only for compliance but to help guide the business.
FUTURE-PROOF AND FOOL-PROOF An automated label verification can deliver multiple benefits to a food producer. It can increase efficiency, reduce staff count, reduce waste, and improve compliance.
To achieve these significant benefits, care and attention must be taken when designing and implementing the system. Simply attaching a smart camera and entering data into a local terminal will not deliver anything close to the same benefits. For example, if a lineside operator sets a printer up to print a use-by date of “Feb 30” and sets the smart camera up to verify “Feb 30”. Guess what? The so called, verification system passes all the packs!
In label verification there are no shortcuts to success. Yet, for those businesses prepared to make the investment there is the prospect of numerous benefits. Everything always circles back to one thing – It’s all about the data!
A well-designed label verification system should be able to verify 100% of the data on 100% of the products against validated source production data.
JentonDimaco
www.dimaco.co.uk
FACTORY&HANDLINGSOLUTIONS | APRIL 2023 9
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
