NEWS FULL STEAM AHEAD
In the food and drinks industry, steam is used extensively for heating and sterilisation processes. It is important that all those involved in the
specification and operation of steam systems have a good understanding of control features and maintenance. Tetra Pak Processing UK., has taken advantage of Bürkert Fluid Control Systems’ steam training sessions, which are held regularly at the company’s headquarters in Cirencester, UK. The correct design and installation of a steam system ensures safe, efficient and reliable operation.
Understanding the principles that affect the performance of a steam system is important, and is one of the reasons why Tetra Pak Processing UK has chosen to send its staff on a training course.
Alex Duckworth, service account manager at Tetra Pak Processing UK, explained: “The global relationship between Bürkert and Tetra Pak meant that we already knew before attending the training that it would be a beneficial experience. We wanted to increase our knowledge and understanding of the Bürkert technology used in the control of steam processes and this course did exactly that. “The increase in knowledge from attending will definitely benefit not only my colleagues and I, but also our end customers.”
For more information contact
sales.uk@
burkert.com
PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY RECOGNISES BENEFITS T
he benefits and potential of combined heat and power technology are being increasingly recognised by UK pulp and
paper processors post-pandemic, according to a new survey by Aggreko. Over 90 percent of respondents to the
temporary equipment supplier’s questionnaire agreed that since 2020, they could see the potential of CHP in their businesses. All 200 manufacturing stakeholders surveyed went on to say that they intend to implement CHP solutions in their operations within an average of five months. These findings come as Aggreko publishes its latest guide on CHP and its use in the UK pulp and paper processing sectors. The guide discusses the UK’s energy shortfall and growing concerns for energy security in the pulp
and paper sector, and how CHP or ‘cogeneration’ could alleviate these issues and make operational processes more efficient. It goes on to highlight how businesses could save 20% on their energy bills and improve the security of their energy supply with greater uptake of flexible CHP generation. Cogeneration is an efficient process that captures and uses the heat by-product created when
generating electricity. This simultaneous process can reduce carbon emissions by up to 30% when compared to conventional generation that takes electricity from the grid to power separate on-site furnaces or boilers. Unlike remote power stations, CHP systems are usually situated on-site or nearby, allowing users to
make optimum use of ‘waste’ heat. This heat can then be directed for use in a wide range of industrial processes and can even be converted to support refrigeration. CHP improves sustainability and lowers energy bills, making it a champion technology for both
businesses and environmental groups. Its ‘decentralised’ aspect also makes it an attractive option for those looking to stave off downtime as a result of domestic energy shortfalls – a problem that engineers predict will get progressively worse over the next decade. Despite its considerable benefits, CHP has seen much slower uptake in the UK compared to
mainland Europe where the technology is far more common. Previous research from Aggreko has found this can be partly explained by the belief that CHP is difficult to fund as a permanent solution, necessitating the development of flexible rental options that improve accessibility of the technology. With the publication of this guide, Aggreko is looking to dispel the financial misconceptions and increase rate of uptake for pulp and paper processors across the country, helping these businesses to save money and accelerate efforts toward ‘net zero’. To access this industry-specific guide, visit:
https://www.aggreko.com/en-solution/chp-report
ASSET MANAGEMENT RANGE UNDER ONE BANNER A
ES Engineering has announced the launch of the AES Engineering Reliability Group (AES Reliability). This brings the range of asset management and plant reliability companies under one banner, offering one of the most comprehensive services on the market.
The launch of the new group follows a two-year period of expansion and acquisition and includes: AVT
Reliability, which has bases in Cheshire and County Cork, Van Geffen Reliability, based in the Netherlands and AVT Reliability, based in Tennessee, USA. Technical director of AES Reliability, Lee McFarlane, said: “Every company in the group shares one key
attribute – it has reliability in its DNA. Very few, if any, companies can deliver the comprehensive, 360° service that the AES Reliability group offers. “In addition to on-site services, our Remote Diagnostics Centres are staffed by certified engineers 24
hours a day, 365 days a year, providing on-demand support to clients requiring instant or routine problem diagnosis.” He added: “Our aim now is to continue to expand the AES Reliability group, with the simple goal of
improving the reliability of our customers’ assets and operations, to save them time and money.” AES Reliability consultancy and on-site services encompass troubleshooting support, condition
monitoring, structural monitoring, pipework vibration compliance, rotor dynamics/reciprocating services, energy assessment and pump reliability.
www.aesreliability.com
“The original designer and manufacturer of coaxial valves with 60 years of experience”
Te
Ema : Emaill:
john.osborn@coaxvalves.co.uk Web:
www.co-ax.com
Tel: 01908 067583 We
High flow, high pressure, unique valve solutions for all standard and arduous Applications”.
6 MAY 2021 | PROCESS & CONTROL
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66
