search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CALIBRATION


Validation of test comparisons in well- controlled conditions and with very good


uncertainty of the reference measurements can be achieved by a third-party that is familiar with field well test operations


pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) package to perform the conversion from line to standard conditions, or from the in-use flow meter conditions to reference flow meter conditions.


• If the devices are far from each other, the cumulative volume measured must be three times larger than the storage volume between both flow meters. It is important to remember that the longer the recording, the more accurate the established uncertainty of both devices will be.


• If the devices are far away and the flow reaches the in-use flow meter long before the other device, then the reference flow meter recording time should be defined in order to capture the same type of flow passing through both meters.


• No choking should occur between both devices to keep the PVT package consistent and for the quick evaluation of the line or standard conditions of both devices. • Both devices should be within the sweet spot of their working envelope. • Both devices should be set with the


relevant intrinsic fluid properties package, or equations of state (EOS) to ensure proper calculations.


• The reference flow meter’s transmitters or sensors should be within the specification and zero trimmed or corrected for deviation in order to account for any potential bias. To ensure validity of flow meter measurements, comparison tests can be conducted either during the buying process, before delivery, or sometimes later when results do not match client expectation or reservoir model forecasts. Validation of test comparisons in well-controlled conditions


and with very good uncertainty of the reference measurements can be achieved by a third-party that is familiar with field well test operations. This helps to avoid any conflict about who is right or wrong and provides a clear final statement based on statistical analysis, physics, and field expertise. This work should therefore not be left to the meter manufacturers, as they can be over-optimistic about the performance of their product.


TÜV SÜD www.tuvsud.com/en-gb/nel


OCTOBER 2021 | PROCESS & CONTROL 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66