PC-MAR24-PG32-33.1_Layout 1 08/03/2024 11:42 Page 32
WATER & WASTE TREATMENT
Sponsored by
IMPROVING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION EFFICIENCY
Matt Hale, International Sales & Marketing Director, HRS Heat Exchangers, discusses the benefits of
anaerobic wastewater treatment and the role heat exchangers play
onventional wastewater treatment in many regions consists of three distinct phases: primary, secondary, and tertiary. The primary treatment involves the mechanical removal of solids by sedimentation or flotation and is followed by a secondary treatment which removes organic matter through microbial decomposition. A further final, or tertiary, treatment may also be required depending on the final destination of the wastewater – such as re-entering the mains water supply.
C
The choice of secondary treatment depends on a number of factors including the wastewater’s chemical and biological oxygen demand (COD & BOD), operational and maintenance costs, sludge production, desired effluent quality, and microbial concentration. The choice is generally between aerobic or anaerobic treatment, although a combination of both methods can also be used.
In recent years we have seen a steady increase in the use of anaerobic digestion treatment techniques for the treatment of wastewater (and other effluent streams), but before we can examine what is driving this, it is important to understand the differences between aerobic and anaerobic treatment, as well as the pros and cons of each. Anaerobic and aerobic systems are both forms of biological treatment which use microorganisms to breakdown and remove organic materials from wastewater. The key difference between aerobic and anaerobic treatment is the presence of oxygen. Aerobic treatment is typically applied to efficiently treat low strength wastewater (with relatively low BOD/COD values) when the treatment requires the presence of oxygen. In contrast, anaerobic treatment is typically applied to treat wastewater with higher organic loading. In aerobic treatment, oxygen (air) is used to circulate the material, providing the right conditions for aerobic bacteria to reproduce. These bacteria assimilate and then break down organic matter and other pollutants like nitrogen and phosphorus into carbon dioxide, water, and biomass (sludge). As the name
32 MARCH 2024 | PROCESS & CONTROL
suggests, anaerobic digestion utilises bacteria which do not need oxygen. They break down organic material in the wastewater into methane, carbon dioxide, and biomass (digestate).
Some of the factors in favour of aerobic treatment include the fact that it has less odours, and nutrient removal from the wastewater to the sludge can be more efficient – meaning that treated water can often be discharged directly into the environment. However, oxygenation of the wastewater can require large amounts of energy (or a large surface area for the treatment lagoon) and untreated biosolids can settle out from the process – requiring further treatment or disposal. The capital investment (and space) required for aerobic treatment is usually greater than that needed for anaerobic facilities.
While there are pros and cons to both approaches, anaerobic digestion (AD) has a number of advantages, including: • AD is better at dealing with slurries with higher solids content
• AD produces biomethane gas which can be captured and used as a renewable energy source (including providing the energy to run
the AD plant itself)
• AD produces less sludge (digestate) for a given volume of wastewater
• The stable digestate produced by AD is easily converted into a valuable biofertiliser • AD plants generally have a smaller footprint than aerobic treatment While the final choice of aerobic or anaerobic wastewater treatment will depend on the unique situation of each treatment facility, the advantages outlined above, together with greater utilisation and uptake of AD technologies, means that the use of anaerobic digestion is rapidly increasing in the wastewater sector, either as the main secondary treatment, or to further process the biosolids produced by aerobic processes. As the points above show, one of the major
benefits of anaerobic treatment is its improved energy efficiency and the lower volume of residual solids produced as digestate. However, when designing or upgrading an AD plant there are numerous ways to maximise operational efficiency – improving both economic returns and environmental performance.
External digester heating (for example, using HRS DTI Series heat exchangers) offers a
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58
