search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE


FASTENINGS & ADHESIVES


strUctUraL aDHesiVes HISTORY IN THE MAKING...


There is little doubt that the advent of structural adhesives changed the course of modern industry. Today, various types of structural


adhesives are available, many of which have evolved considerably over the years, leading up to the


patented hybrid technologies of today. Bob Goss senior technology specialist at Henkel, comments


A


polymers) adhesives are today available in both single and two-part versions, catering for fast and slow cure times, as well as large gaps.


lthough a multitude of definitions are available, general opinion suggests that a structural adhesive is a substance


that fastens together elements to produce high modulus, high strength, permanent bonds. Such an adhesive must be capable of transmitting structural stress without loss of structural integrity (within design limits). From a LOCTITE perspective, the origins


of structural adhesives extend back over half a century, when the first anaerobic products came to market. However, anaerobic adhesives such as LOCTITE 306, 307, 308 and 310 were only suitable for small rigid joints – and typically not plastics at that time. Furthermore, all of these products required an activator and were relatively slow curing. The solution to slow curing arrived with


LOCTITE 312, the so-called ‘minute-bonding’ adhesive. One drawback, however, was its limited cure-through volume, so it was only suitable for use with very small gaps. This all changed with the development of 326, which offered both fast bonding, better impact resistance and good cure- through volume, tolerating gaps up to 0.5mm. Ongoing product development meant the


company’s range was able to address an increasing number of structural applications. For instance, LOCTITE 330 and 329 Multibond were the first toughened acrylic adhesives, enabling the joining of flexible metal panels, while LOCTITE 340 and 341 were able to facilitate the passing of bonded parts through a paint bake system. Today, an even more diverse range of toughened acrylic products is available, including clear products for display work. Structural adhesives such as epoxies and


polyurethanes were available prior to their introduction into the Henkel portfolio, but these too have evolved over time. Notably, the addition of epoxies in the past 20 years provided new structural bonding opportunities thanks to their increased chemical resistance and gap-fill properties, while PU (polyurethane) and MS (silane-modified


42 DESIGN SOLUTIONS JULY/AUGUST 2021 ongoing DemanD


The popularity of structural adhesives across industry continues to grow as more and more design engineers come to appreciate the opportunities available. Using adhesives in comparison to fasteners or welds is likely to deliver more uniform stress distribution over a larger area, produce sealed joints, reduce the risk of corrosion and provide the ability to join dissimilar materials. But which structural adhesive is best? The


answer depends on many factors, particularly as each adhesive in this category has its own set of attributes. Today’s structural bonders include epoxies, acrylics, PU polymers, MS polymers and silicones, which range from extremely strong to extremely elastic in order to meet demand for both rigid and flexible bonds.


Rigid bonds are mainly required to


accommodate high mechanical force transfers, typically when replacing traditional assembly methods. In contrast, elastic adhesives are finding growing use in applications where there is high dynamic stress resulting from temperature differences or component movement, for example.


Differentiating factors


When addressing the various structural adhesives in order of highest strength/least flexibility, epoxies top the list. These can deliver strength of circa 35 MPa for high-performance bonding applications, but offer a low percentage of elongation in comparison with other types of structural adhesives. For bonding rigid substrates, epoxies are ideal. Aside from delivering maximum strength, these adhesives provide excellent resistance to moisture and chemicals, as well as heat resistance up to 220°C for one hour. Application examples include golf clubs (bonding the composite head to the shaft), bicycle front forks (composite to titanium or aluminium) and heat exchanger end caps. It is also worth noting that both conducting and insulating epoxies are available. Acrylics offer high strength (albeit less


than epoxies) on a wide range of substrates. These products cure on demand under heat, light or ambient conditions (depending on the adhesive selected) and some need no mixing. Acrylics also offer gap-filling, corrosion resistance and high heat resistance properties (30 minutes at 200°C), and are excellent at bonding dissimilar substrates. Applications include electric motors and loud speaker magnet bonding. PU adhesives represent a great balance


between strength, durability and flexibility, supported by ambient curing. These products are particularly ideal for suppressing noise and vibration, with excellent adhesion on both plastics and metals. Potential uses are wide ranging and include trailers, wind turbine blades, skylights, electrical potting and filter


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82