• • • SAFETY IN ENGINEERING • • •
PPE solutions using wireless technology
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) encompasses a wide range of products, and many of the most common and useful are in the low-tech category, such as the humble hard hat or face mask. Such products are low cost and effective.
By Nick Wood, Sales and Marketing Director, Insight Sip H
owever, in the developed world at least, our tolerance of risk is reducing and expectations of worker safety increasing.
At the same time, our use of tools and machinery to enhance productivity can introduce new dangers to workplaces. Aside from the human cost of a workplace accident and injury, there is a hard economic factor via absence costs, lost productivity and potential liabilities in the face of stricter legislation. Hence there is strong interest in using technology within PPE solutions to protect against a wider range of risks.
Wearable devices We have become familiar with consumer wearable devices that act as health and fitness trackers for sports enthusiasts, or just for people interested in their overall wellbeing. The basic concept of such a device can be adapted to suit a workplace safety use case. The key difference is that for a PPE oriented device, rather than simply provide data to the user, it would typically be connected to some kind of management system in order to alert supervisors of any incident.
Applications of this type
could include: • ‘Person down’ detector, which would identify a fall, or a motionless worker and trigger an intervention
• Physiological markers, such as heat, or hydration levels to indicate when a worker would need rest or water, something that will become more necessary with increasing temperatures
• Gas or pollutant detection, in cases where there are risks from hazardous materials. Depending on the use case, for some it might
be sufficient to alert the user, or it may be necessary to provide a real time alert to a supervisor. In the case of a large site, it might also be necessary to provide a location for the affected user so they could be quickly found and assisted.
Wireless technologies The next issue to look at is what kind of devices and with what kind of wireless technologies might be required to deliver the above applications? The cases where physiological data is collected
typically require skin contact, so some kind of patch or wristband device would be an obvious solution. Others such as environmental sensing may not need this, but in nearly all cases, the device would require wireless connections to allow the worker to carry out their tasks unimpeded. In terms of connecting the device to other
systems, there are a number of options, depending on the characteristics of the work site. The key questions would be: • Is the site indoors or outdoors • Is there good cellular coverage (not necessarily the case indoors, or underground)
• Is there good coverage via WiFi, or some other local network across the site?
It might be enough for the device to connect via
Bluetooth to a mobile phone, which can then handle such tasks as localisation, however, this approach relies on the worker carrying their phone at all times, and keeping it charged! Alternatively,
30 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING • JULY/AUGUST 2025
the device could connect to a WiFi network if one is available. Localisation could be achieved via GPS in most outdoor settings, but this stops working in most indoor situations and certainly in anything underground. In such cases, a system for localisation would have to be installed, which could use WiFi access points, Bluetooth beacons or the new channel sounding technology, or Ultra-Wide Band. Which to use depends on how accurate the
localisation needs to be and how important it is to always be in coverage. Normally a moderately accurate solution would be enough to locate an injured worker, and could be achieved via Bluetooth or WiFi, but the best precision would be obtained using Ultra Wide Band. In all cases, such solutions would require an infrastructure of Anchor Point devices in known locations, which may be a non-trivial issue in a fast-changing environment such as a construction site.
Indoor or underground
working environments For sites where cellular coverage is not realistic, such as underground, or inside large structures, and there isn’t a network infrastructure in place, LoRa technology could be a good solution for a device to communicate with a central system. LoRa allows the setting up of a private network with long range, and provides good connectivity even in challenging environments. Adaptive data rate technology is built into the LoRa encoding scheme, which allows a dynamic trade-off between range and data rate, so devices can remain connected even if there are significant
electricalengineeringmagazine.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
