search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT IN ONCOLOGY


Project Optimus: helping or hindering cancer drug development?


Experts say that Project Optimus is a necessary reform in the oncology space, but one that should be applied with caution.


JUSTINE RA


The purpose of Project Optimus is to reform the dose optimisation and dose selection paradigm for cancer drug development. Credit: ESB Professional via Shutterstock.com.


A


longside the multitude of guidance documents, recent years have seen the US Food and Drug Administration


(FDA) ramp up workshops and project implementation efforts in a bid to drive innovation in drug development. Agency eyes have zeroed in on oncology, with the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) introducing frameworks such as Project Optimus to reform the dose optimisation and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development. While the framework of Optimus is not new


to drug development, it is relatively new to oncology. In non-deadly indications, researchers have been employing the framework for quite some time because the


chances of patient survival are higher, making drug toxicity less acceptable in these indications compared to a high-morbidity indication such as cancer, says Dr Fouad Namouni, president of research & development at Blueprint Medicines. The philosophy of oncology drug


development—both academically and in pharma—is to save patient lives. However, development has historically prioritised drug efficacy and eliminating tumours and cancer at the expense of increased treatment toxicities. This can be seen across several therapies such as chemotherapy, small molecules, antibodies, and cell and gene therapies, most of which have a positive impact on efficacy and patient survival but come at the cost of toxicities.


Clinical Trials in Oncology | 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44