The chemistry in your collaborations is electric, whe- ther it’s with horsegiirL, VTSS, or DJ Gigola. What makes a collaboration truly transformative for you, and how do you balance your own vision with someone else’s energy?
I like to think sometimes that I am like a shoemaker when it comes to collaborations. I listen closely and try to imagine what style of voices could fit to what type of sound and then proceed to tailor a vessel (instru- mental production) that fits for the desired impact. Everything is tailor made for the artist and the occa- sion.
To put it simply though. Finding common ground and being able to match visions and experiment freely in an environment where both Artists knowhow is respected , applied and valued is the backbone for every Colla- boration.
Trust in my Abilities as I do in yours.
The idea of combining genres in such an unconventio- nal way—ghetto-tech, Miami bass, electro, and rap— isn’t just about sound experimentation; it’s about re- jecting conventional genre boundaries. The fact that these combinations come about spontaneously, wi- thout prior planning, highlights the creative freedom MCR-T embraces. It’s almost like an artistic impulse, one that comes from within and doesn’t need to con- form to expectations. This improvisational process shows a fearless, intuitive approach to music, which can produce truly original results.
The claim of “pushing boundaries” is a powerful sta- tement. It’s not just about blending sounds but about carving out a space in the music world where no one else has ventured. The willingness to mix industrial EBM with death metal growls is a perfect example of MCR-T’s unapologetic approach—there are no rules if it feels right. And the boldness to make these com- binations “without losing my sense of identity” rea- lly shows the self-assurance of an artist who is fully grounded in their vision and not afraid to experiment.
The message of “I LOVE SOUND” encapsulates MCR- T’s philosophy perfectly. It isn’t just about making mu- sic; it’s about exploring every possible sonic territory and pulling elements from all corners of music. It’s about embracing the gray areas and complexities of both sound and identity, which speaks volumes about how MCR-T approaches creativity—not as a series of neatly defined roles (rapper, DJ, producer), but as a multifaceted artist. The rejection of these labels in fa- vor of a broader identity as “an artist” feels empowe- ring and defiant. There’s a deep sense of personal and artistic integrity here.
The idea of being truly present in your music—of allowing the emotions and experiences you’re going through to shape the work—adds an extra layer of au- thenticity. The reference to “Method Acting” in music shows how deeply MCR-T is invested in the emotional process of creation, not just the technical or aesthe- tic aspects. Music, for him, is not just an outlet, but a reflection of self. This brings a raw, visceral quality to the work.
RISE OF LIVE FROM EARTH & SHAPING THE NEW TECHNO SCENE
Live From Earth emerged from the underground—raw, DIY, and politically charged—before evolving into a force reshaping club culture. What began as a rebe- llious collective operating on the fringes of the scene has grown into a movement redefining the sound and energy of modern techno.
His genre-blurring approach and fearless experimen- tation push the boundaries of dance music, challen- ging conventions and inspiring a new wave of artists. Through Live From Earth, he has helped foster an envi- ronment where creativity thrives beyond industry ex- pectations, proving that the underground can set the standard for the future of electronic music.
“To be honest I haven’t realized I’m changing anything at all. I feel like talking to you in this interview would be the first Praise of its kind where I could start to think like we are changing something.”
“Of course in my mind everything I do , i do with utmost conviction so WHEN i do it i think that i’m bringing new styles and a different outlook and presentation of the arts to the table. Is it valued by my ULTRAS Supporter Family? Absolutely ! Is it shared , praised and presented on the big screen like other more conventional work is ? No its not.”
“So we continue to reach for the Stars. Appreciating the sentiment that people really think we are changing something. He smiles
If it’s one thing I would notice though as i’m writing
this.Its A. Spitting Rap Vocals on Electronic Dance Mu- sic tracks in German and English and bringing it to the Big Room as well as B. bringing MCing / Mic work back into the DJ Booth alongside players like Partiboi69 , Nia Archives and the certified OG DJ Assault.
In a scene that has historically overlooked its founda- tional influences, he is actively reshaping the narrati- ve, bringing rap, ghetto-tech, and Miami bass back into the conversation. His work challenges electronic mu- sic to acknowledge its history, making space for Black voices and sounds that have long been sidelined.
While progress is being made, there is still a need for greater recognition, inclusion, and credit for the Black artists who pioneered and continue to shape the genre. Through his music and presence in the scene, MCR-T is not just reviving the past—he’s building a future where electronic music fully embraces its roots.
I feel people acknowledge where it came from. Just wealthy white promoters or ignorant ravers deem it as a Gimmick or some sort of Party Trick rather than edu- cating themselves and acknowledging it as an integral part of the Culture.
Techno has been whitewashed to the point of where people would never consider it as being Black Music.
I’ve been in situations where people would want to un- dersell my Slot to me in comparison to other non Live Acts on the Bill. Not because of a difference in Artist Size or Reach or anything merely based on the fact that they chose to argue that my Live Vocal Elements would “come naturally to me” and it wouldn’t be that hard for me so they wanted to maintain an identical fee for another Artist who would essentially do the Job
26
mixmagde.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62
