| Advertorial feature Fair play in efficiency guarantees!
Fuel efficiency is usually an important factor in utility supply agreements. Purchase agreements for power plants supplying power, steam, water or other utilities to their offtakers typically include guarantees to ensure that the plant is operated efficiently and maintained diligently over the contract term. In particular when the fuel is provided by the offtaker, the efficiency guarantee must be evaluated continuously, and deviations from the contracted guarantees may lead to significant bonuses or penalties on top of the payments for the deliverables.
Why must fuel efficiency be corrected for the settlement of the purchase agreement? Fuel efficiency varies with operating conditions, and such “natural” variations must of course not result in any commercial impact on the monthly bill to the offtaker. The correction of the fuel efficiency to a contractual reference state protects the supplier, because otherwise, if the plant was dispatched at low load or under disadvantageous ambient conditions and the contractual guarantees were based on ‘normal operation’, the supplier would be penalized without fault. Vice versa, the offtaker must be provided with a benchmark for efficiency
guarantees that is valid under all operating conditions.
How much detail is needed in the correction procedure?
The answer to this question depends on the complexity of the plant. For a simple plant configuration with only a few influencing parameters, a straight-forward equation with correction factors based on look-up tables or vendor curves may be sufficient. For a more complex plant with multiple possible combinations of the equipment and high interdependency of the generators, as for instance a gas turbine-based combined cycle power plant, this approach may however lead to erroneous results, since even a family of corrections curves cannot correctly represent all possible operating modes of such plant. The evaluation in every hour of operation is very different to a performance test, where correction curves are applied to a single base load operating point. The use of a detailed thermodynamic model representing the entire power plant process – a so-called Fuel Demand Model (FDM) – has proven to be the best solution for calculating guaranteed fuel efficiency in daily operations.
The Fuel Demand Model is the comprehensive benchmark for efficiency guarantees.
Because it is built on equipment-level performance characteristics that can be fine- tuned to exactly match vendor and contract guarantees, the Fuel Demand Model covers all possible combinations of equipment. Due to the use of a commercial-grade heat balance software (e.g. EBSILON®
Professional), physically
sound part-load corrections are applied, even if such information is not available from the contract or vendor data.
ENEXSA combines in-depth know how in Fuel Demand Models with long-term experience in IPP projects.
ENEXSA has a proven track record for providing Fuel Demand Models to large IPP, ISPP and IWPP projects in the Middle East and South-East Asia. As integral part of many of our plant settlement systems, Fuel Demand Models by ENEXSA are currently used for purchase agreements governing a total capacity of more than 28 GW of power, 5,000 t/h of steam and approximately 3 Mio. m³/d of desalinated water.
If you need a proper Fuel Demand Model, please contact ENEXSA!
Energy Expert Sof tware Applicat ions
Contact Information: Josef Petek, Manager Commercial Operations, ENEXSA GmbH, Parkring 18, 8074 Raaba-Grambach, Austria
www.enexsa.com
josef.petek@
enexsa.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47
