search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
| Hydraulic machinery


Left: Figure 3: Original distributor noise measurement close to penstock


Above: Figure 4: Penstock with insulating layer


Figure 5: Original distributor phase resonance results


(figure 4). However, the intervention did not achieve compliance with Italian environmental noise regulations. These laws mandate nighttime noise levels below 50 dB(A) and daytime levels below 60 dB(A) in residential zones, with an additional 3 dB(A) penalty for tonal components—regardless of the unit’s output power. A dedicated analysis was conducted to investigate


pressure pulsations within the spiral case and associated phase resonance phenomena. The findings suggested that modifying the RSI behaviour would be a more practical and cost-effective solution than replacing the penstock entirely.


Specifically, the analysis proposed replacing the


distributor to reduce RSI effects while retaining the current runner (including its identical spare). The recommended design involves increasing the number of guide vanes from 16 to 24, which was found to yield the lowest synchronization factors of RSI pressure pulsations at the spiral case inlet—thereby mitigating vibration and noise transmission along the penstock. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate a significant reduction in the RSI


resonance factor at the spiral case inlet with the proposed distributor modification. This factor, ranging from 0.0 (ideal) to 1.0 (worst case), directly correlates with the severity of vibration and noise issues. The analysis revealed a significant reduction in the


resonance factor – from the original value of 0.136 to 0.047 – achieved through the implementation of the new distributor configuration. Additionally, the 24-wicket gate solution offers a further advantage: the shorter gate length increases the distance between the gate ends and the runner inlet, resulting in pressure pulsations with lower peak-to-peak amplitudes. These positive results provided


Distributor in open position


New arrangement N.24 Wicket gates


a solid foundation for designing a new distributor with 24 wicket gates.


Designing the new distributor posed several challenges, primarily due to the following reasons: 1. The limited space available on the head cover, originally intended for 16 guide vanes, required precise optimization of the lever and link dimensions to accommodate 24 guide vanes.


2. The Francis turbine is equipped with a relief Section A-A


Old arrangement N.16 Wicket gates


Figure 6: New


distributor phase resonance results


Below: Figure 7: Distributor comparison


Section A-A


Old arrangement N.16 Wicket gates


Distributor in closed position


New arrangement N.24 Wicket gates


www.waterpowermagazine.com | June 2025 | 27


arrangement


New


arrangement


Old


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45