search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WASTE-INFORMED DECOMMISSIONING | DECOMMISSIONING & DISPOSAL


Quality Objectives (DQO), supported by the development of waste-led process wiring diagrams (following IAEA recommendations), are tools that we typically use to clearly map out whole lifecycle requirements, challenges and opportunities from waste retrieval/generation through to final disposal. This approach ensures that management and data collection requirements at each step of the decommissioning and waste management lifecycle are identified and given appropriate consideration, including non-technical requirements, wider interfaces such as compatibility with treatment/disposal route acceptance criteria and workface implementability. This also forms the starting point for identifying waste management options aligned with the requirement to minimise radioactive waste disposal volumes and implement appropriate characterisation to support optimised waste routing. Following a DQO-based approach allows for the development of underpinned, integrated strategies that consider technical and non-technical aspects, which can be de-risked at the earliest opportunity. Whether tackling nuclear waste or simple hedge trimmings in the garden, wiring diagrams can be developed to support a DQO exercise by identifying the long list of questions to support answering the problem statement. The wiring diagram methodology was developed by the IAEA and follows the waste management lifecycle steps from retrieval of a waste stream to final disposal. For that


waste stream, they will represent the baseline and potential alternative approaches for its management by identifying the needs, risks and opportunities associated with the implementation of these waste management approaches. The diagrams also become an extremely effective tool in communicating strategy preferences, challenges and opportunities to stakeholders. Additionally, the use of a DQO exercise will identify


any waste characterisation activities, such as waste characterisation on site, needed to support appropriate waste characterisation and disposability assessments for all waste types. This can include activities to demonstrate that some bulk demolition waste streams are non-radioactive (out of scope) to support the consignment of lower activity waste to appropriate treatment and disposal routes, and to support the management of higher activity waste pending – for example, segregation, treatment, conditioning, and interim storage – once a GDF becomes available. Moreover, a DQO exercise, whilst identifying desk-based studies, will also identify modelling/trial activities that if delivered will give a useful insight to the general approach. Practical work through trials, training and simulation to mock-up or functionally to test an idea saves time and money and can be vital in validating a detailed design. Trials can also be carried out to reduce the risks to a project and, if a minor modification is required, be rapidly implemented and tested with minimal impact on the programme. ■


Specialist Nuclear Solutions


Applications to immobilise contamination within pipes, ducts, and voids prior to cutting and disposal.


Design & Development of bespoke solutions to improve safety and reduce cost when conducting nuclear decommissioning.


A growing portfolio of successful projects in the nuclear decommissioning industry worldwide.


Over 30 Years’ Experience Cost Saving Solutions Remote Application Solutions Reduces Operator Exposure


01225 864 864 . stevevick.com SVI Nuclear Engineering Advert 178x124 AW.indd 1 07/05/2024 18:38:19 www.neimagazine.com | July 2024 | 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53