search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Left: A graphic showing newcleo’s SMR design


undoubtedly an attractive investment opportunity. They are smaller and simpler than conventional large-scale nuclear plants so require less capital to build, while their simplicity makes them easier to operate and maintain in the long-term, keeping costs low across the full lifecycle. The reactors will be built using modern modular construction methods, thereby expediting project timelines, which means investors will have less time to wait until they get a return on investment. The design and delivery approach can be easily replicated using a tried and tested supply chain – in comparison with large-scale nuclear plants, where the design might vary based on factors such as the specific site and regulatory environment – and this will lead to more accurate budget and timeline projections and reduce the risk of overruns. What’s more, new nuclear projects will not only


supply abundant, clean, and dispatchable power to national grids, they will also play an instrumental role in decarbonising heavy industry. Sectors including oil refining, petrochemicals and steel production require constant, baseload supplies of energy, and in huge volumes. While these sectors have traditionally run on fossil fuels, they urgently need to decarbonise. And nuclear is one of the only technologies that can provide a dedicated supply of reliable, clean, and abundant power. Small and advanced modular reactors can be built next


to the industrial sites they supply. This is a huge selling point in comparison to other clean energy technologies; renewables such as wind and solar are intermittent and land intensive whereas hydrogen, which has great potential as an energy vector, is not in itself an energy source. Use of nuclear for embedded generation also reduces the issues associated with grid connection, both from a capacity and timescale perspective. So, heavy industry needs to decarbonise and nuclear is the obvious solution. Private funding has a huge role to play in financing the development of these next-generation reactors. That said, governments need to lead by example when it comes to the energy transition. If we take the UK as an example – the Government has set an ambition to deploy up to 24 GW of civil nuclear power by 2050, reduce


industrial emissions by at least two-thirds by 2035 and at least 90% by 2050. It is right that public funding plays a role in accelerating energy transition projects to help us meet these targets. There are, of course, drawbacks to publicly funded


projects. Generally speaking, they are slower to get going and more likely to face stop-start delays due to spending reviews and changing political agendas. Governments can, however, help widen the pool of


investment even further by signalling their early support to nuclear developers, giving private investors the long-term confidence they need to fund the nuclear development process; this might take the form of conditional contracts or a sponsorship mechanism. And certainly, in the UK, the lack of such a mechanism is holding back progress. Here, developers (and investors) are currently required to undergo the entire development period at great expense without knowing if their project will even be approved – through years of site investigation, public consultation, regulatory scrutiny of their design, environmental impact assessments and more. It is an enormous gamble and a significant deterrent for private investors. If the Government were to signal its financial and regulatory support to developers much earlier in the process, it would boost investor confidence and allow the industry to make significant headway. Put simply, the Government needs to move from a situation where it is announcing relatively small investments of public money to, instead, announcing billions of pounds of private money, all achieved by simply creating an enabling and supportive environment in which investment can be made with early confidence. The good news is there is a great deal of interest in


investing in new nuclear. At newcleo, for example, €400m of seed funding was raised within two years of launching and last year the company opened a capital raise of up to €1bn. The nuclear sector is undoubtedly on the right trajectory – we now just need the right conditions in place to enable privately-funded projects to thrive alongside public sector led projects in order to maximise the enormous potential of this clean energy source. ■


www.neimagazine.com | June 2024 | 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49