COVER STORY | NUCLEAR’S NEXT CHAPTER
Planning at that horizon also requires rethinking how plants are operated day-to-day. Asset management, automation, and AI are converging into something closer to a single operating system for the enterprise, united by a common purpose: extracting more value, reliability, and sustainability from the infrastructure that already exists, while building the capacity to manage what comes next. Individual assets will increasingly carry digital identities that track performance, risk, regulatory compliance, and carbon impact across their service life, and maintenance will shift from fixed schedules to dynamic, probabilistic forecasts that adjust in real time. The most advanced operators will run their plants
More than half of the electrical equipment in a typical installation can continue to serve reliably for extended periods if the active components are modernised, properly monitored, and maintained. Source: Foro Nuclear
accommodating technologies that have not yet been developed. Physical layouts should allow for future access and reconfiguration without requiring extensive civil modifications. And digital infrastructure should be built to collect and store operational data even where the analytic tools to fully exploit it are still evolving, because the data gathered today will prove invaluable to the engineers who inherit these plants in 2060. This is one reason integrated approaches matter so much
in nuclear. When electrification, automation, and digital monitoring systems are designed as a coherent whole rather than stitched together across multiple vendors and generations of technology, the result is an architecture that can evolve gracefully over time. Piecemeal modernisation, by contrast, creates layers of technical debt that compound with each subsequent upgrade cycle, making every future intervention more complex, more costly, and more disruptive than it needs to be. The industry trend is moving in this direction, with
The instrumentation and control systems installed today will eventually become the legacy systems of 2060. Source: ABB
growing recognition that modernisation of balance- of-plant systems – including the non-safety-critical electrical distribution, the control room interfaces, and the monitoring infrastructure – must be approached with the same long-term, systems-level thinking that is applied to the reactor itself. Anything less is planning for the next decade when we should be planning for the next half-century.
through connected ecosystems that bring together technology providers, energy partners, analytics specialists, and regulatory expertise under a shared operational picture. The result is better decisions, faster response to risk, lower operating costs, and greater confidence that performance, compliance, and sustainability targets are being met as part of day-to- day operations rather than treated as siloed exercises. In a fleet expected to run for another half-century, that kind of integration is not a nice-to-have; it is the foundation on which everything else depends.
Policy is the bottleneck, not physics None of this happens without the right policy environment. Life extension is a technical undertaking, but it is enabled, or blocked, by regulatory and political decisions. The International Energy Agency’s 2050 Net Zero Pathway is explicit on this point: solar and wind, while essential, are insufficient on their own to reach net zero, and reliable, low-carbon baseload power is needed to complement intermittent renewables and stabilise grids under the growing demand created by electrification, industrial expansion, and the rapid scaling of data centre infrastructure. Nuclear is not the whole answer, but the pathway to net zero almost certainly does not exist without it. Yet operators will not commit to the significant capital
expenditure that deep modernisation requires unless they have confidence in long-term policy frameworks. Governments can meaningfully accelerate nuclear life extension by streamlining permitting processes, maintaining consistent regulatory environments across political cycles, and providing clear investment signals that translate into bankable commitments. Where those signals exist, momentum is already building; where they are absent, aging plants face an uncertain future regardless of their technical potential. The plants of the 1970s and 1980s were built for a world that no longer exists, a world of stable demand curves, minimal digitalisation, and few alternatives to fossil fuels. The job of those who service these plants today is equally about keeping them running, but also about ensuring that they are ready for a future that will demand more from nuclear than ever before. The engineering knowledge exists, the technology is proven, and the fleet is already in the ground, connected to the grid, generating low-carbon power around the clock. It may well be the most valuable energy asset the world already owns. The question is whether there is the collective will, among operators, regulators, and governments, to invest in it accordingly. ■
18 | May 2026 |
www.neimagazine.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
