search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


USE-OF-FORCE RULING LEAVES OFFICERS EXPOSED A


Court of Appeal ruling has left police officers ‘dangerously exposed’ in cases involving use of


force, the Police Federation of England and Wales is warning. In October, the court found in favour of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) in the case of ‘W80’, a firearms officer being investigated over the fatal shooting of Jermaine Baker in Wood Green in December 2015. They directed a gross misconduct hearing and under this new ruling, the panel would be entitled to consider whether the officer’s honestly held belief that force was necessary was an objectively reasonable one in all the circumstances.


The ruling has far reaching


ramifications for any officer involved in a use-of-force case, as John Partington, our Deputy National Secretary explains. “This effectively means that a breach of the standards could arise when an officer uses force because they honestly believe it is necessary and that turns out to be mistaken.


“So, for the purposes of misconduct proceedings, their use of force will be judged by whether a right-thinking person with knowledge of the facts available to the officer would consider it a necessary use of force. This is a subtle but very important deviation to how police officers have been trained.” The case has been appealed to the Supreme Court, but that hearing may be a year away. In the meantime, officers of all ranks are in a “sort of limbo” according


to Steve Hartshorn, PFEW’s National Firearms Lead.


He said: “Officers are trained in the current criminal law application in terms of how they justify force. This added situation may give them rise to pause and think ‘is what I’m doing objectively reasonable when compared to what I’m actually trained in?’ The key thing is that officers have not been trained for this situation. So, we’re calling on the National Police Chiefs’ Council and the College of Policing to issue advice and guidance to officers. “We want to win the case at the Supreme Court but if that doesn’t happen, we need to realise that the


Appeal Court’s ruling will apply. Right now, we’ve got officers potentially falling foul of misconduct regulations, so the NPCC and the College need to act.” We believe the ruling impacts on


every serving officer in the country, from chief officer to PC, that may have to use force (or authorise force). The advice to our members is if you become involved in a Post Incident Procedure or have a concern, it is more important than ever that you seek Federation advice and legal support and be aware that this new standard could be used against you. In addition to calling for updated


training the Federation is raising this important issue at the highest levels.


John Partington Steve Hartshorn


Nick O’Time By Colin Whittock


APRIL 2021 | POLICE | 09


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36