search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Heather burning and red grouse


Using specialist machinery heather burning is now a more efficient and safer process.


KEY FINDINGS


Rates of heather burning have increased in recent decades and concerns have been expressed by some that this may be impacting upon sensitive upland ecosystems such as blanket peat. Grouse breeding densities were not higher on moors where there was more heather burning, but breeding success was higher. Increased heather burning can be justified in terms of grouse moor economics, but we have no information on the impact on other ecosystem services


Dave Baines David Newborn Mike Richardson Gail Robertson


48 | GAME & WILDLIFE REVIEW 2016


Rotational burning of moorland vegetation is considered by most grouse moor managers to create structurally diverse habitat that helps maximise red grouse abundance for shooting by increasing the number of breeding territories that a moor can support. Hence, with arguably faster heather growing rates following general reductions in sheep grazing and an increasing use of specialised tractor mounted cutting, flailing and fire-controlling equipment that permits safer burning during dry conditions and better ignition during damp ones, burning rates have increased in the last decade. Consequently, there is growing concern that these increasing levels of burning, especially on designated sites of national and international habitat conserva- tion status, and particularly on deep peat, are impacting upon upland ecosystems. Described impacts, some of which are the subject of bitter contention, include reduc- tions in carbon sequestration following removal of peat-forming vegetation, especially species of Sphagnum moss, release of dissolved organic carbon into streams and rivers and flash flooding.


In the face of these growing concerns, we sought to establish whether there was an economic-based justification in terms of higher grouse production that may explain grouse managers’ decisions to escalate their burning rates. To do this, we examined the influence of burning on heather height and structure, and on grouse density and breeding success at 36 moors in northern England. Driven grouse shooting was practiced on all moors and on each moor, full-time gamekeepers were employed not only to burn heather, but also to control generalist predators of grouse and strongyle worms that parasitize grouse and can cause boom-bust population cycles. On each moor, grouse were counted within 100 hectare (ha) blocks in spring to estimate the number of pre-breeding pairs and again post-breeding in July to count young and adult grouse. We measured vegetation composition, structure and its height, together with peat depth using a one-metre probe, at 100 points along a pair of transects running through each grouse count area. We used the collective measures of peat depth to assign each count area as either heath, where at least 50% of measures were less than 40cm of peat, or blanket bog, at least 50% of measures greater than or equal to 40cm. Heather height showed greater variation on moors where more heather was burned and this relationship was similar on moors that were predominantly of deeper


www.gwct.org.uk


© Laurie Campbell


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92