search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
inbox


mime artist trying to communicate by means of a podcast. Jonathan Sale, London


Journalists should know what words mean We journalists are supposed to be good with words, so why do so many seem not to know the meaning of the words they’re using? ‘Pandemic’ means ‘global epidemic’,


so ‘global pandemic’ is tautological and means ‘global global epidemic’, which is obviously nonsense. One can’t expect any better of grandiloquent politicians but journalists should know better. Similarly, few seem to know what the


prefix ‘pre’ means, hence the tautological neologism ‘pre-order’. I even heard ‘pre-prepared’ recently. Also, many now use the words ‘Covid’


and ‘coronavirus’ interchangeably, when, in fact, Covid-19 is the illness caused by the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. There’s also widespread misuse of


‘trafficked’ and ‘traffickers’. People who are trafficked (mainly young women) come to the UK (or elsewhere) in the belief that they are coming to proper, legal jobs.


The people who come across the Channel in small boats and dinghies (mainly young or youngish men) know that they are coming illegally – that’s why they come that way. The people who arrange their transport are smugglers, not traffickers.


Oh, and the plural of ‘medium’ is ‘mediums’ only when it refers to people who pretend to speak to the dead. When it means TV, radio, newspapers and so on, the word is ‘media’. You’d think people in the media would know that. Sheila Miller London N4


Tech giants should pay tax – and for content The battle between Australia and Google/Facebook could offer a glimmer of hope for content producers. It seems to have taken a decade for governments to wake up to the monopoly power of the fintech giants; maybe they will start to regulate and tax these giants fairly. What has amazed me is the way Google has ‘scraped’ images and content with gay abandon. The most amusing aspect of being on Google Images is that they reproduce everyone’s work and add in small type ‘Images may be subject to copyright’. They and we know full well they are subject to copyright, but only now is anyone daring to ask them to pay for this. The big tragedy is that Google wasn’t set up as a not for profit trust, as Wikipedia was. It is good to see the EU and even Little Brexit England finally starting to work out how to make the fintech companies pay their way in terms of both taxes and journalistic content. David Siddall Cockermouth, Cumbria


Moved house or changed your email address?


Please let us know. You can update your membership


record on the website nuj.org.uk or email membership@nuj.org.uk


STEVE BELL


THE OWNERS


theJournalist | 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28