Citizenship test heightens immigrants’ sense of exclusion n Housebuilding no help to Generation Rent n Influence of childhood self-control n
Islington residents feel less victimised than 30 years ago n Increasing inclusive schooling in China n Flexibility not helping workers n
NEWS
Offenders view short-term sentences as waste of time n Home-based businesses lack policy support n Cyber attacks key threat to UK n Dark web plays growing role in illegal arms n Immigrants left out of legislatures n Teachers’ role in peacebuilding n
NEWS
Citizenship test heightens immigrants’ sense of exclusion
T
HE MULTIPLE-CHOICE ‘Life in the UK’ test that must be passed as one component of the UK citizenship process
to become a British citizen is in urgent need of fundamental review, says a new study from the University of Leicester. Citizenship tests were introduced in the UK in 2005 amid heightened anxieties over immigration and the perceived failure of multiculturalism. “Such tests and other policy instruments such as citizenship ceremonies were viewed by some to be appropriate solutions to these challenges,” explains researcher Professor Leah Bassel. “It was claimed they would facilitate integration into British society.” In a four-year project, researchers explored how migrants themselves experienced the citizenship test process. The study was based on more than 150 interviews with migrants of 39 nationalities and analysis of survey data, and highlighted many participants’ discontent with how the citizenship test is constructed and implemented. Crucially, many migrants pointed to ways they felt the citizenship test process excluded them
rather than helped them to integrate: that it was about immigration control rather than integration. The study highlights migrants’
criticisms both of the content of the ‘Life in the UK’ test and its lack of clear connection to their daily lives. Much of the knowledge needed for the test
“
social backgrounds and lengths of time in the UK. A review, the research team recommends, must address the fear and anxiety the citizenship test process creates for migrants. The public should also be better informed about what is involved in becoming a UK
Many migrants pointed to ways they felt the citizenship test process excluded them
that participants deem useful – such as how to access public services – has disappeared from the most recent version of the test and preparation materials. Researchers also found the test process to generate divisive and negative perceptions of some groups of migrants as ‘deserving’ and others as ‘undesirable’. In addition, for some women, the time, money, energy and skills required by the test process can make existing inequalities worse and create new challenges. In view of these challenges, the study suggests a full review by representatives ranging from the Home Office to civil society organisations, community representatives and migrants of different nationalities,
citizen beyond a kind of ‘pub quiz’, as many see it. In the short term, specific recommendations include reintroducing practical material about life in the UK into the test; allowing the test to be prepared for and taken in other languages; reducing fees and offering means-tested fees and/or interest-free loans to cover the costs of naturalisation; and making the citizenship ceremony optional rather than compulsory. n
” i Contact Professor Leah Bassel, University
of Roehampton Email
leah.bassel@
roehampton.ac.uk Web
www2.le.ac.uk/departments/sociology/ research/uk-citizenship-process/ ESRC Grant Number ES/K010174/1
AUTUMN 2018 SOCIETY NOW 3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
