search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LANDSCAPING & EXTERNAL WORKS 79


FENCING SOLUTIONS THAT WILL STAND THE TEST OF TIME


All property developments require a fencing solution that is attractive, durable and low maintenance. Here, John Abernethie of Birkdale looks at why it’s time to switch from traditional to more modern options.


aesthetics. A visually attractive fencing solution will make a major contribution to the look and feel of a garden as well as the property’s overall appeal.


W


The next is strength and resilience. As the effects of climate change accelerate, the UK is regularly experiencing strong winds as well as periods of heavy rainfall – it is crucial that a fencing system is equipped to deal with this. Finally, a solution that is easy to install will help to ensure high-quality results. A fence that can be erected quickly and without signifi cant labour, will also help to reduce associated costs. So, how do traditional fencing materials deliver in these areas?


FENCE POSTS Traditionally there have been two key options to select from – concrete and timber. Timber is often viewed as the most visually pleasing thanks to its natural aesthetic. However, timber falls short when it comes to strength and durability due to timber treatments which stop being effective against rot.


Once a fence is installed, timber posts often react with the moisture in the soil and begin to rot at the base. The whole fencing structure will weaken, and become unable to withstand a strong gust of wind. Often this means timber posts are replaced every fi ve to  years. With this in mind many look to concrete instead. Although this might be considered an unattractive and bulky solution that can take a long time to transport and install, concrete is undoubtedly a stronger and more durable


hen specifying a fencing system, certain characteristics should be top priorities. Firstly:


option than timber. However, concrete still has other disadvantages. The material is prone to chipping and hairline cracks that allow water ingress. This will eventually lead to the concrete post failing. Furthermore, from a sustainability perspective, concrete is incredibly damaging. In fact, cement, the key ingredient in concrete, is responsible for 4-8% of total global CO2


emissions.


Then, at the end of its working life, concrete has to be sent to landfi ll. Thankfully, there are modern solutions that can harness the benefi ts of both timber and concrete – with none of the drawbacks. Galvanised steel is around  lighter than concrete, meaning an 8 ft post weighs just 7 kg. Conversely, a concrete post of the same size weighs


about  kg. As such, more galvanised steel posts can be transported to site in one van load – and safely installed with ease. This also enables the installation process to be faster, which ultimately lowers the overall cost of a project.


Housebuilders that specify galvanised steel can also rest assured that they are not compromising on strength. Many steel fence post solutions have been tested to withstand wind speeds of up to  mph. urthermore, on top of the galvanising process these posts are often powder coated which improves the aesthetics and adds to the weather resistance of the steel, meaning it will not deteriorate, rot, split warp, crack or chip over time  offering the ultimate fi t


WHEN SPECIFYING A FENCING SYSTEM, CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THE LIST OF PRIORITIES


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84