PROJECT REPORT: ADAPTIVE REUSE 41
crafted buildings of that area.” They were determined to be as “faithful as possible to the Georgian architecture,” so rather than the incongruous roof terrace that had been created the designers said “let the bees have the roof, and we’ll do you a lovely terrace on the lower floors.” Morriss adds: “There was a real commitment from the client to follow that logic.”
He says this conscious effort to craft the spaces fed into the goals which the client has in its ethical business, and which it wanted to embody in the building, including the idea of the beehive, and of “working together towards a common good.” The hive theme emerged early on, he says, and became the “DNA of what that space would be about, and not just a motif.”
Flagstones were installed in the hallway, reinstated to complement the original retained exposed stone staircase, and the “very strange” front door was replaced; it was previously metal made to look Georgian – “I can’t help think it was to keep the planners out!,” says Morriss with a smile. Other key fittings and details include terrazzo formed basins and intricate detailing on the stairs and floor finishes.
ADF NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2024
Trevor Morriss says that SPPARC make a concerted effort to “work with and listen to” conservation bodies and statutory authorities to ensure a harmonious design process.
A hive of connections The building has had its second and third levels restored, but at the same time SPPARC worked to link as many of the spaces as possible, chiefly using the part- refurbished stair that curls its way through the building, but also critically using the new social hub in the extension created at ground floor level.
Introducing a focal point of a central
hub, which was to result in the unique structural honeycomb timber and glass roof to the extension, was the project’s key feature since the early stages of the concept design. But this is not only as an aesthetic flourish but also as a functional means to bring light to the lower ground floor rented space (the tenant is a social enterprise tackling homelessness).
The extension replaced a typically ostentatious 1990s ‘conservatory’-style glazed pyramid (which, says Morriss, “ironically had planning permission,”
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
The hexagonal structure is no mere design conceit, says Morriss; “It’s not just a piece of glass with decoration below, it’s a structural shape doing a job; too often you see something which is just cladding”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84