search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
38


PROJECT REPORT: EDUCATION & RESEARCH FACILITIES


“The airtightness achieved was largely made possible because of the CLT” Clara Garriga


the existing school, not just for acoustics but also for fire purposes,” she explains. “We then also had to keep a good distance from the original school building, trying not to have windows overlooking, and to keep nice outdoor spaces around the new pavilion and existing school.” She continues: “It was an important technical requirement that took a lot of consideration; keeping enough distance to the boundaries while not reducing the playground space.”


Planning was also a potential sticking


point, with the site’s location in the Marchmont conservation area and the original school’s grade-B listed status. “Planning was highly involved, especially in the early stages,” explains Garriga. “It’s a very beautiful area, so the planners were looking for something that wouldn’t impact negatively on the context, noting a preference for the pavilion not to be seen from the street. They were very focused on the volume, and avoiding overshadowing and imposing on neighbours.” They designed the building as distinctly modern, not mimicking the original school


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


but complementing it, and the planning department agreed with this approach. The design solution took cues from its surrounding context, relating to volume and height, such as keeping the horizontal lines level with the height of the terraces along the street. “There was a lot of discussion with planning on how this could sit next to the original building without trying to copy any of the features,” says Garriga. “That really led to some of the design decisions such as the stonework and some of the horizontal lines we picked from the stonework. We tried to keep it quite simple but in dialogue with the original building.” Overall, planners agreed the proposal was “respectful of the setting,” Garriga says.


Going passive


One thing that impacted the budget and the design further down the line was the decision to aim for Passivhaus certification. Discussions for what to do with the site first began in late 2018, and it wasn’t until just before 2020 that the idea was first proposed by the council, who had implemented a policy to consider a Passivhaus approach


ADF JANUARY 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76