27
The safety of students, staff, and visitors is of utmost importance when selecting a heating system for educational facilities. Without appropriate safety measures, burn injuries can lead to severe consequences, including hospitalisation and long-term medical care. From 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022 alone, NHS Digital recorded 863 admissions for burn injuries caused by contact with heating appliances, radiators, and pipes – this figure represents an approximate 6% increase compared to the previous year. The statistics highlight the importance of choosing a low surface temperature (LST) radiator. An LST radiator ensures that the surface temperature does not exceed 43°C, which significantly reduces the risk of burns while still providing sufficient warmth to the room. Other safety features, such as rounded corners and edges can also help to mitigate the risk of injury in case of a trip or slip. These features should be incorporated into the design of the heating system to provide a safe and secure environment for everyone in the educational facility.
Sustainability is another factor to consider while selecting a heating system in Higher Education settings. As previously mentioned, energy efficiency plays a vital role in modern heating. Space heating constitutes a significant portion of the energy consumption and running costs for universities and colleges. Installing energy-efficient radiators with features such as low water content and fan assistance can bring substantial positive impacts both environmentally and financially. These features can facilitate rapid heating and a more even distribution of heat throughout the room, which will in turn reduce energy usage, carbon footprint, and operating costs. According to a study by the National Energy Foundation, radiators with low water content and fan assistance features can heat a room up to 20% faster than traditional radiators, resulting in a remarkable amount of energy savings. While style and aesthetic appeal may seem less of a priority when it comes to heating, it is in fact a pivotal element one should not overlook. Students’ satisfaction with the learning environment is strongly linked to their perceptions of the facility’s aesthetics and spatial organisation and whether a facility reflects their school’s mission. Campus appearance influences the decision of up to 80% of prospective
ADF MAY 2023
students, and savvy institutions recognise the role the physical environment plays in their marketing efforts and how it drives investment in their facilities. Showcasing iconic elements can establish a sense of place and honour campus traditions, unique identity, and history. The last thing you want is a radiator that has an unpleasant design, which would detract from the overall aesthetic you’ve tried to establish. A sleek design allows the radiator to blend in seamlessly and enhances the aesthetics of educational premises by adding a professional touch to the space. The use of colour can also further articulate intention and build cohesion within a campus palette, making it crucial to be able to colour-match radiators to match the theme of the space. That being said, to create a conducive learning and working environment in higher education, select a heating solution that is not only safe and efficient but also encompasses a range of styles and designs that meet the unique needs and preferences of each institution. Solutions are avaiable that provide both functionality and aesthetics, providing a variety of options to complement a project’s interior decor and specific requirements. This enables institutions to select the best-suited option for their needs. Investing in such a heating solution can enhance the overall experience of students, staff, and faculty by creating a comfortable and visually pleasing environment that supports learning and productivity.
Dawn Simpson is managing director of Contour Heating
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
A study conducted by Healthy Schools found that students in classrooms that are either too hot or too cold tend to experience discomfort and distraction, which negatively affects their performance in academic tasks
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36