search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Industry News


Regulator publishes fire safety remediation report for English social housing


T


he Regulator of Social Housing has published the findings from its latest quarterly survey on the fire safety of 11


metre plus buildings in the social housing sector. All social landlords are required to submit


quarterly data to RSH and the Ministry ofHousing, Communities and Local Government on the fire safety remediation of relevant buildings for which they are responsible. Of the 17,457 relevant buildings reported, 99%


had had fire risk assessments undertaken and 11% were found to have a life critical fire safety (LCFS) defect relating to the external wall system (EWS). Te vast majority of relevant buildings (88%) had no LCFS defects. 11% of the 1,932 affected buildings are due to


have remedial work completed within the next six months, and 84% are expected to complete in the next five years.


Some landlords with multiple affected buildings


have indicated they are prioritising works on higher risk buildings, which can be more complex and take longer to remediate. Tese landlords have a duty to put interim measures in place to ensure the safety of tenants until works are fully completed. Te regulator will continue to monitor the


performance of landlords in remediating 11 metre plus buildings and the progress they are making against their plans. Social landlords must have robust systems


and processes in place on fire safety and its management, underpinned by accurate and up to date data. Tis is a key aspect of landlords ensuring that tenants are safe in their homes. Will Perry, director of strategy at RSH, said: “Tis


quarterly survey is an important tool in helping us monitor the progress being made by the sector on remediating fire safety defects. Fire safety is


a fundamental responsibility and we expect all landlords to take prompt and effective action so that tenants can feel safe in their homes. “Tis includes putting mitigating measures


in place to protect tenants from any risks in the interim period before works are complete. Boards and councillors have a duty to ensure these plans are delivered. “Meanwhile our ongoing regulation, including


our programme of inspections and responsive engagement, helps us check that landlords are meeting the outcomes of our standards – including those relating to fire safety.” Landlords have previously claimed that delays


in progressing schemes is due to a range of factors including navigating complex legal arrangements with freeholders and leaseholders, difficulties sourcing contractors and supply chain delays.


Essex council’s housing stock found to have serious safety failings


Te Regulator of Social Housing has found that Harlow District Council failed to meet the new consumer standards over a series of afety shortcomings. As a result, the regulator gave the Essex council


a C3 grade for its housing service, which means there are serious failings and it needs to make significant improvements.


RSH investigated Harlow Council aſter


reviewing its Tenant Satisfaction Measure (TSM) results. RSH concluded that the council had: • Carried out fire risk assessments for only 20% of buildings that it should have done, out of its 9,100 social housing homes.


• Over 500 high risk fire safety remedial actions overdue, and a further 1,500 medium risk actions overdue (the majority of which are more than 12 months overdue).


Harlow Council has employed an external consultant to help it to develop a detailed improvement plan as a priority and the RSH will be engaging with the landlord as it addresses these failings. Te Council is working to complete


the outstanding fire risk assessments and resulting actions, starting with the highest risk


blocks. RSH continues to scrutinise the Council closely and it must demonstrate that it is reducing risks to tenants as it puts these issues right. Kate Dodsworth, chief of regulatory


engagement at RSH, said: “It is unacceptable that Harlow Council has failed to meet fire safety requirements. Providing safe, decent homes for tenants begins with robust data, and this must include fire risk assessments for every home that needs one. “We identified these failings by scrutinising


the council’s TSM results. It is the landlord’s responsibility to notify us themselves of material issues. Our new proactive approach and expanded consumer remit is helping to bring issues to the surface earlier. We expect all providers to regularly review and evaluate their services to improve outcomes for tenants.” Te investigation was carried out as part of RSH’s responsive engagement work.


Councils are committed to improving housing standards


Councils are committed to addressing the challenges of unfit housing and want their residents to have the security of a safe and well- maintained home with any issues quickly and satisfactorily addressed. Responding to the Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner’s announcement of measures to


protect renters and drive up housing standards, Councillor Adam Hug, Local Government Association housing spokesperson, said: “It is good the Government is setting out measures to protect renters and improve housing standards. “Councils are committed to addressing the challenges of unfit housing and want their


18 | HMMOctober/November 2024 | www.housingmmonline.co.uk


residents to have the security of a safe and well- maintained home with any issues quickly and satisfactorily addressed. “While we look forward to seeing the detail


behind this announcement, councils need further funding and support to raise standards in the private rented sector. “Councils could also do much more if they


were given the right tools, such as removing the requirement for Secretary of State approval for larger selective licensing schemes.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44