Industry News
Shocking revelations about housing discrimination revealed
for a home and they will often end up living in shoddy, unsafe and unsuitable accommodation, according to one of the country’s leading campaigning organisations. The charity Shelter surveyed 13,000 people about
A
their housing experiences and if the results are applied to the whole UK population, they suggest that 17.5 million people are living in housing that is substandard or hazardous, unaffordable, or unfit for their needs. Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, said:
“Decades of neglect has left Britain’s housing system on its knees. A safe home is everything, yet millions don’t have one. Lives are being ruined by benefit cuts, blatant discrimination and the total failure to build social homes.” The survey’s results are published in a 35 page
report, ‘Denied the right to a safe home’. It’s headline findings are:
• Black and Asian people are almost five times more likely to experience discrimination when looking for a safe, secure and affordable home than white people (14 per cent against 3 per cent);
• More than one in 10 disabled people, and 7 per cent of those earning under £20,000 a year, found it hard to find a safe and secure home;
• Twelve per cent of black people and 14 per cent of Asian people reported safety hazards in their homes, such as faulty wiring and fire risks,
housing emergency in the UK means that Black, Asian and disabled tenants are more likely to face discrimination while looking
compared to just 6 per cent of white people;
• Fourteen per cent of black people and 16 per cent of Asian people reported living in a property with significant defects with walls or roof, compared with only 8 per cent of white people; and
• Overall, 56 per cent of black people are affected by the housing emergency, compared with 49 per cent of Asian people and 33 per cent of white people. 54 per cent of disabled people are affected compared with 30 per cent of non-disabled people and 58 per cent of single parents are also beingaffected.
NEW HOMES AND LAW CHANGES NEEDED In response, Shelter is calling for 90,000 new social homes to be built every year to stem the crisis of affordability and to cut the estimated 1 million people on council waiting lists. High housing costs and specifically the failure of
housing benefit to keep pace with rising rents means that for 20 per cent of people housing was a source of stress, while 14 per cent admitted they cut back on food or fuel to prioritise paying the rent or mortgage. Shelter says the pandemic shone a stark light on
the state of Britain’s housing, with poverty and poor and overcrowded accommodation recognised as a key factor in many areas where Covid infections and deaths were highest. Structural racism and discrimination meant
black, Asian, and disabled people, gay people, people on low incomes and single parents are overwhelmingly more likely to experience poor and inadequate housing, the charity said.
Black and Asian people are almost five times more likely to experience discrimination when looking for a safe, secure and affordable home than white people
As well as being more likely to be on low
incomes, racial minorities are more likely to be offered poorer homes or “steered” into certain neighbourhoods, Shelter said. So-called “No DSS” discrimination and the ineligibility of some migrant workers for housing support further diminished the housing chances of marginalised groups. Despite big changes in the housing market in
recent decades, Shelter says that housing laws have changed little since the 1980s, trapping many in a series of short-term private lets and creating a “permanent state of stress and instability” for many tenants. An estimated 1.5 million people are bringing up
children in the private rented sector (twice as many as 15 years ago) while hundreds of thousands of older people are likely to be renting privately in years to come, “facing unaffordable rent increases at a time when most owner-occupiers are starting to be mortgage-free”.
Supreme court rejects challenge to UC ‘two-child limit’
Fears over rising rent arrears and increased eviction levels have followed the country’s highest court rejecting a challenge to the Government’s “two- child limit” for welfare payments. Dating from April 2017, the rule restricts child
tax credit and Universal Credit to the first two children in a family, with limited exceptions. The challenge was brought by two single mothers and their children, supported by the Child Poverty Action Group, on behalf of all those affected by the policy. The Supreme Court justices were asked to decide
whether the limit was compatible with human rights laws, including the rights to respect for private and family life, to found a family and to freedom from discrimination, as the policy disproportionately affects women. The judges dismissed the case, upholding previous decisions of the high court and court of
appeal. The judges concluded that while the policy did have a greater impact on women, who make up 90 per cent of single parent families, there was an “objective and reasonable justification” for that effect, namely to “protect the economic wellbeing of the country”. They also concluded that any impact of the policy on children in families with more than one sibling is “justifiable”. The families who brought the challenge have
both been affected by the limit, as they have children who were born after the new rule came into force under the Welfare Reform and Work Act on 6 April 2017. Carla Clarke, the head of strategic litigation at
CPAG, said: “This is a hugely disappointing judgment, which fails to give any meaningful recognition to the reality of the policy on the ground and its desperately unfair impact on children.
6 | HMM August/September 2021 |
www.housingmmonline.co.uk “We know the two-child limit increases child
poverty, including child poverty in working households, and forces women to choose between an abortion and raising their families without enough to live on. “We continue to believe that the policy is
unlawful and, together with our clients, are considering taking the matter to the European court of human rights so that no child is left out of the social security safety net purely because of their birth order.” There are now fears that welfare payments will
not be increased for many low-income families and that rent arrears, already under huge pressure during the Covid lockdowns, will increase significantly. This is turn could see a big jump in evictions from September onwards, with the easing of rules which have discouraged landlords from taking back possession of their properties.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
