DIGITAL PATHOLOGY
Cracks in the foundation: glass slides and the future of digital pathology
The evolution of digital pathology has revolutionised the study of tissue. But could the traditional glass slide be holding back the potential of digital workflows and artificial intelligence in histopathology? Rachel Finn looks at what is required of microscope slides and cover glass to realise the full benefits of digital technology.
As digital pathology gains widespread adoption into clinical and research setings, atention continues to focus on the promise of AI-powered diagnostics, high-resolution scanners and whole- slide imaging (WSI). Across clinical laboratories, academic medical centres, and research institutions, investments in scanners, cloud infrastructure, and algorithmic analysis are accelerating. These innovations promise faster turnaround times, greater diagnostic consistency, improved access to specialised areas, and entirely new paradigms of precision medicine. However, an essential component of pathology remains largely overlooked: the glass slide itself. The quality of microscope slides and
cover glass is emerging as a critical factor influencing digital image quality, workflow efficiency, AI-driven analysis, and ultimately a patient diagnosis. Inconsistencies in slide preparation, staining, and cover glass application can introduce artefacts, distort image clarity, and hinder automated interpretation. Even minor imperfections like air bubbles or debris have been recognised as a potential source of diagnostic difficulty.1 These artefacts could mislead algorithms, reduce diagnostic confidence, and delay a clinical decision. As reliance on digital pathology workflows and AI-driven analysis grows, these challenges reveal a critical truth: inconsistencies in slide and cover glass quality introduce a significant vulnerability that can compromise the full potential of precision diagnostics. The contradiction is striking: pathology stands at the cutting edge of clinical AI, yet it still relies on glass technology rooted in a predigital era. This disconnect creates cracks in the foundation that, if left unaddressed, may limit the scalability and reliability of digital pathology. Examining hidden variables embedded in preanalytical workflows, and evidence on imaging artefacts and scanning efficiency highlights the growing need for standardised laboratory practices, continuous training, and rigorous quality control long before a slide ever reaches the scanner.
Slides no longer merely support tissue, they play an active role in diagnostic outcomes. Glass slides and cover slips now need to be engineered with digital compatibility in mind.
Moving beyond tradition For more than a century, glass slides have served as the primary medium for histological tissue evaluation. In traditional pathology, their role was simple: holding a thin section of tissue and ending at the microscope. Interpretation relied on the human eye, possessing adaptive qualities allowing the trained pathologist to use visual search and contextual reasoning to mentally
June 2026
WWW.PATHOLOGYINPRACTICE.COM 47
AdobeStock / romaset
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
