Sponsored by
News
Review highlights ongoing risk of harm linked to electronic patient record systems
HSSIB’s latest report emphasises how Electronic Patient Record (EPR) systems still contribute to patient care being missed, delayed or recorded incorrectly. This is despite national recommendations and actions intended to reduce risks. The report is a thematic review of HSSIB and
its predecessor organisation, HSIB, investigations associated with EPR systems. The review aimed to identify where EPR systems had been considered in reports, the problems associated with them and their impact on patient safety. The review also revisited the safety recommendations and safety observations HSSIB had made that related to EPR systems. The review highlights that EPR systems can
improve patient care and support safety but that there are reoccurring issues with the design and implementation of the systems that can also create safety risks. Common issues include poor usability and interoperability between EPR systems and other software, outdated hardware and infrastructure affecting system performance, and limited resources to support the safe ongoing use of EPR systems. HSSIB’s review gives specific examples of
where EPR system problems have caused patient harm and had a detrimental impact on safety, on organisational efficiencies and on wider national efforts to digitise healthcare. The safety of patients was put at risk by EPR systems where they created
did not have the functions an organisation needed or did not support the user (patients and staff), they had contributed to patient safety incidents. 2. Implementing an EPR system that meets the
needs of users - variation in governance processes for implementing EPR systems at national, regional and organisation levels meant associated risks to patient safety were not always identified and mitigated. 3. Seeking feedback and ongoing EPR system
conditions within which a patient did not receive care, their care was delayed, or they received incorrect care including from being misidentified. In a specific case referenced in the report, a four-year-old girl received five incorrect doses of blood thinning medication as the prescription was wrongly entered on the electronic prescribing and medicines administration (ePMA) system. The system did not identify the error and this incident contributed to bleeding around her brain. To identify the common themes, HSSIB reviewed
all of its reports (2018 – 2025). HSSIB identified recurring themes that illustrated how specific aspects of EPR systems may have contributed to patient safety issues. The themes are set out under three headings, with several key findings under each: 1. Choosing an EPR system capable of meeting the needs of an organisation - where EPR systems
optimisation - staff reported limited routes for raising concerns about poor functionality and usability of EPR systems, and limited action when concerns were reported that could impact on patient safety. The review underscores the need for further
action to strengthen digital safety. It also offers local learning prompts to support provider organisations in identifying and addressing risks associated with procuring, implementing and optimising EPR systems. Following publication of the report, HSSIB is
planning to launch further investigatory work in relation to EPR systems. This work will focus on the links between EPR systems when referring patients for specialist care, and on how EPR system loss or downtime is managed by organisations. Further information about these investigations will be made available on HSSIB’s website in the near future. View the report at:
https://tinyurl.com/ y2s3a3b4
Mediplus TIVA Sets Dedicated infusion delivery systems
Designed in conjunction with anaesthetists to meet the highest TIVA standards as outlined in the guidelines*
Get in touch: +44 (0)1494 551200 @MediplusTIVA
marketing@mediplusuk.com
www.mediplusuk.com
*Nimmo AF, Absalom AR, Bagshaw O, et al. Guidelines for the safe practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA): joint guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Society for Intravenous Anaesthesia, 2018)
January 2026 I
www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 13
Nuttapong punna -
stock.adobe.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
