search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
www.stnonline.com


DATA, STATISTICS AND TRENDS


Demand Continues to Outpace Supply, But Bus Output Still Best Since Pre-COVID


WRITTEN BY RYAN GRAY | RYAN@STNONLINE.COM B


uoyed by the latest trough of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency funds, electric school buses rose to the third- most produced fuel type during the


latest production cycle, as reported to School Transportation News by manufacturers. An estimated 2,900 ESBs rolled off assembly


2023 Bus Table_P11.pdf 1 12/6/22 4:45 PM


lines over the past year, a 145-percent increase over the previous period. It is also noteworthy that ESBs supplanted propane in the hierarchy of fuel preference, especially as the latter is now only available from Blue Bird and Micro Bird via ROUSH CleanTech systems. IC Bus and Thomas Built Buses had offered propane buses on the PSI platform, which is no longer available to the school bus market. Both OEMs ostensibly await production of a Cummins propane engine, which is not expected until 2026. Even more interesting, diesel output spiked to nearly 23,000 units, the most since 26,897 before COVID-19. This rise comes despite the efforts of the EPA Clean School Bus Program to incentivize school districts and bus contractors to purchase zero-emissions vehicles and the California Air Resources Board Low NOx Heavy Duty Omnibus Regulation (alongside New York’s aggressive regulation requiring only zero- emissions purchases starting in 2027) mandating them into existence. It remains too soon to tell if the


additional diesel purchases indicate pre-buys ahead of the CARB rule taking effect with model-year 2024 engines and further reducing emissions through model-year 2027, or if the dearth of propane engines is driving student transporters back to diesel. Perhaps both, but either option is better than foregoing replacements altogether. Gasoline remained steady at over 9,600 units,


down slightly from the prior year but in the ballpark of the past five. That number could increase as fewer diesel engines are made available and as Cummins is expected to release its new octane engine next year. Overall, school bus manufacturing totalled 38,528, the most since before the COVID-19 pandemic. While representing a 17-percent increase from the previous year, some supply chain constraints continue. To a tee, the 10 school bus manufacturers that


responded to STN reported continued backlogs tied to their supply chains. Heading into 2023, several OEMs shared that their production was already booked, as they made up for late and deferred orders from 2022. “More specifically than chassis, frame rails appear to be the pinch point” for medium-duty trucks, commented Steve Tam, vice president of truck and bus for industry analyst ACT Research. Despite concerns about the availability of Type A cutaway chassis over the past couple of years, the approximately 6,829 units


School Transportation News Annual School Bus Manufacturing Data


School Year


2020-2021 2022-2023


2020-2021


2018 2019 2019-2020


2017 2018 2016 2017


2015 2016 2014 2015


2013 2014 MFSAB 2,246 1,606 1,448


1,761 2,231 1,870


2,000 (est.) 1,061 (est.)


1,585 (est.) 2,500 (est.) Type A-1 3,519 4,010 2,827


1,948 2,589 3,361


2,338 2,978


2,084 2,303 Type A-2 3,310 2,081 2,932


6,671 6,641 4,404


7,356 6,424 6,132 6,017 Total Type A 6,829 6,091 5,759


8,719 9,230 7,765


9,694


9,402 8,216


8,320 Type C 29,098 24,117 23,101


31,834 25,965


31,554 32,291


29,757 28,640


27,071 Type D 2,601 2,665 2,616


4,508 3,790 2,948


4,145 4,143 4,344 3,662 Totals* 38,528 32,873 31,476


44,634 44,781 36,678


46,130 43,302 41,200 39,053


*Total count does not include MFSAB, AAV or “white” buses that are typically used for commercial applications. Source: School Transportation News


11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132