AIR CARG O WEEK


ANIMAL TRANSPORTATION F


RAISING THE BAR FOR ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS


BY Edward HARDY


08


T


“The regulatory update reinforces an existing welfare- led direction that has been developing.”


he 2026 update to IATA’s Live Animals Regulations (LAR) represents a further tightening of standards governing the air transport of live animals, with changes spanning training, equipment,


documentation, and across global airfreight networks. Training requirements have been strengthened, with all personnel


involved in acceptance, handling, and loading now expected to demonstrate formal competency aligned with updated LAR modules. This shifts training away from periodic or site-specific instruction towards a more structured, standardised framework. The intent is to reduce variability in handling practices between stations, particularly at outstation airports where consistency has historically been uneven. In practical terms, this increases the compliance burden on operators, who must now maintain ongoing training records, refresher cycles, and demonstrable audit readiness across their networks. Container standards and acceptance criteria have also been refined.


The underlying principles remain unchanged: adequate ventilation, secure construction, and appropriate sizing for the species being transported. However, the revision places greater weight on performance-based expectations rather


operational compliance


More materially,


documentation


requirements


around


species


classification, routing approvals, and special handling instructions have been tightened. The regulatory update reinforces an existing welfare-led direction that


has been developing over several regulatory cycles. There is increased scrutiny of high-risk categories, including brachycephalic breeds, alongside more explicit temperature exposure thresholds and environmental control requirements. Journey planning is now more directly linked to welfare outcomes, with greater emphasis on routing decisions that minimise stress, transit time, and environmental variability. Although the LAR remains a voluntary framework, its operational


influence continues to expand. It functions as the de facto global benchmark for live animal air transport due to its integration into airline acceptance systems and its alignment with external regulatory regimes, including veterinary authorities and CITES-related controls. In Europe, this alignment is reinforced by tightening animal transport regulations, which introduce additional requirements around journey duration, rest intervals, and transporter authorisations. From an operational standpoint, the cumulative impact of these


than purely dimensional


compliance. Containers are increasingly expected to demonstrate suitability under operational conditions, including endurance across multi-leg journeys and varying environmental exposures. This shift effectively raises the threshold for acceptable equipment quality and is expected to drive greater use of higher-specification containers, particularly on long-haul routings or complex interline movements. Documentation


and booking processes have been


standardised to reduce ambiguity during acceptance. A notable change is the wider replacement of the term reservation with booking across guidance material, aligning live animal logistics terminology more closely with general air cargo systems. While largely procedural in appearance, this reflects a broader effort to integrate live animal transport more


fully ACW 11 MAY 2026 into mainstream operational frameworks. www.aircargoweek.com


changes is most visible in capacity management and cost structure. More stringent welfare and container requirements typically result in increased space allocation per animal and reduced effective load factors. This, in turn, raises unit transport costs and reduces scheduling


flexibility, further particularly on long-haul or multi-sector


routings where environmental conditions and handling constraints are more difficult to control consistently. Compliance risk has also shifted more firmly upstream. Airlines


and ground handlers are applying stricter pre-acceptance checks and are increasingly prepared to reject shipments that fail to meet documentation or equipment standards in full. This places greater responsibility on forwarders and shippers to ensure that all regulatory, veterinary, and operational


requirements are fully satisfied before cargo arrives at the airport environment.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14