search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE


EFFICIENCY GAINS A


This case study outlines the efficiency gains delivered to a hydrogen plant following installation of an innovative cleaning technology


new robotic convection section cleaning technology has demonstrated significant efficiency gains


in Steam Methane Reformers (SMRs) since 2017. SMRs are crucial in hydrogen


production for refineries, with capacities ranging from 5,000 to over 300,000 nm3


/h. The process involves


desulfurisation, prereforming, and primary reforming in a radiant wall SMR, followed by CO shift reaction and purification. The radiant wall SMR is the heart


of the hydrogen plant, operating at high temperatures of up to 900°C. IGS offers free heater evaluations, studying possible changes in radiant and convection sections. Their services typically show benefits ranging from 1.5% to 5.0% in energy savings or production increase. The following case study highlights


how IGS’s Tube Tech’s robotic convection section cleaning technology delivered a 4.9% radiant efficiency gain, with efficiency enhancement from 40.3% to 42.3%, and a payback period of just three months. The project, in Southern Europe,


involved a twin-cell side-fired primary hydrogen reformer facing high bridgewall temperatures, limiting production. IGS Cetek high emissivity refractory coatings were applied to all radiant surfaces in 2017, increasing emissivity from 0.34 to 0.92 and allowing additional hydrogen production without approaching temperature limits. The coating was reapplied in 2023


owing to its gradual loss of emissivity over time. Throughout the six-year run, the highest reported bridgewall temperature was only 1055°C under more than 110 knm3


/hr hydrogen


production rate, demonstrating the coating’s longevity and reliability. The projects executed during the


2017 and 2023 turnarounds provided immediate payback and operational


28 www.engineerlive.com KEY CASE STUDY HIGHLIGHTS:


• 4.9% radiant efficiency gain • Efficiency enhancement from 40.3% to 42.3% • Payback within 3 months • Hydrogen production rate increased from 108 to 116 (knm3


/h)


High emissivity coating applied to refractory lining


flexibility. Furnace performance evaluation revealed a significant radiant efficiency enhancement (40.3% to 42.3%) with a corresponding bridgewall temperature reduction of more than 50°C. This enhancement increased the hydrocracking unit’s capacity, resulting in an additional production margin of about €4.8m per year. The 4.9% radiant efficiency gain led


to less fuel firing required to produce the same amount of hydrogen, equivalent to an 18,400 MTPA CO2 emission reduction. The achieved radiant efficiency enhancement can be utilised to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions or to increase throughput/severity under the same firing rate. The IGS Cetek application brought an immediate radiant efficiency gain,


as predicted, and post-project analysis corresponded with the pre-project technical evaluation. The refinery now has the option to save fuel or increase throughput under the same firing rate during high-demand periods. IGS continues to closely monitor the unit’s performance for the lifetime of the applied coating systems. IGS Tube Tech’s technology had


a significant impact on improving efficiency, reducing emissions, and increasing production capacity in SMRs, contributing to more sustainable and cost-effective hydrogen production across the entire refining industry.


For more information visit: www.integratedglobal.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60