SAFETY
Illustration showing flame detection coverage
fostering trust and upholding ethical responsibilities. The fire and gas mapping process
employs a consultative approach to conduct a site specific analysis of each setting’s unique challenges and conditions. Hazard mapping software is then employed to model existing and potential flame and gas detection at the site to identify aspects such as any blind spots and also ensure the field device locations are suitable and sufficient to meet the required coverage. The software can verify certain areas are covered by more than one device (also known as a ‘voting detector’), which is useful to rule out false alarms or provide additional confirmation should the actions to be taken in the event of an incident be significant, such as a plant shutdown.
CASE STUDY: BIOWASTE PRODUCTION FACILITY A hydrogen-from-biowaste production facility based in the Midlands was designing its flame and gas detection. In particular, the company was keen to ascertain if the planned gas and flame monitoring system which covered the storage tank and compressor area of the site was both fit for purpose and in line with the appropriate standards and regulations. A total of four storage tanks and
eight compressors at the site process the hydrogen at 300 times standard atmospheric pressure until it is piped onto lorries in the nearby loading bays for onward transportation. Financial margins at the production
facility were extremely tight, creating significant pressure on costs, but the Project Engineer wanted peace of mind that the planned fire and gas monitoring and detection provision was adequate and suitable. Dräger was asked to conduct a fire
and gas mapping audit to consider the planned monitoring and detection coverage across the site, identify any ‘blind spots’, and advise on both the appropriateness of the current siting of the system’s devices and whether any further coverage was needed in order to meet coverage requirements. For further details of this case study see page 12.
CASE STUDY: POWER GENERATION OPERATOR A large operator in the power generation industry wanted to conduct a flame and gas mapping exercise focused on a 50 metre high tower where there were concerns that risks from Hydrogen Sulphide (H2
S) could
endanger personnel. Although the operator was
confident that the gas detection
www.engineerlive.com 41
For more information visit:
www.draeger.com
system was effective in its coverage of the site, concerns had arisen that, in the event of a gas escape, there could be potential for a toxic gas cloud to block the main safe exit for workers, resulting in a less- than-ideal 50 metre climb down an emergency exit ladder. The flame and gas mapping
consultation confirmed that this was indeed a risk that the current detection system did not address adequately, and as a result the consultation advised that extra detection on the stairwell (the main escape route) would be set to provide an early alert for personnel if, in the event of an incident, their escape route could be blocked. As these examples show, fire and
gas mapping is an important ‘best in class’ consideration for fire and gas safety, both at the start of a project, and at subsequent stages as factors or concerns at a site change. It can not only provide peace of mind but also give reassurance in relation to detector siting and coverage, therefore reducing unnecessary detection devices and lowering overall costs.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
