THE CLIMATE CHALLENGE 19
Removing the barriers to progress
Richard Harral of the Chartered Association of Building Engineers (CABE) discusses how the ongoing Part L consultation is the clear way forward to genuine carbon reductions, including closing the performance gap.
F
or all those of us who believe that we are indeed in an emerging climate crisis (and the evidence is compelling
to say the least), news that Government has published proposals to improve the energy efficiency of new housing will be most welcome, if long overdue. Improving Energy efficiency for new homes is critical and the new consultation makes it clear that this is still priority number one. The consultation sets out two key
options for introduction in 2020 as a stepping stone to achieving the ‘Future Homes Standard’ by 2025, which will deliver a 75-80 per cent reduction in carbon emissions compared to a Part L 2013-compliant home. The first option involves a 21 per cent
improvement focusing on fabric improve- ment, and the second a 31 per cent improvement including fabric improve- ment, PV panels and a switch to low temperature heat (typically heat pumps), with Government setting a clear prefer- ence for the latter option. Both are intended to futureproof new homes so that they are capable of easily meeting the full future standard without the need for significant upgrades. For some this won’t be enough – the
debate about the true meaning of zero carbon will no doubt continue (net zero carbon or full zero carbon and whether to include embodied energy expended in construction and across the lifecycle), and the fact that the interim step and the Future Homes Standard both fall short of meeting a full zero carbon metric will be a disappointment. But these are still significant improve-
ments – the Government’s preferred option from 2020 of a 31 per cent improvement on Part L 2013 (equivalent to around a 40 per cent improvement on Part L 2010) takes all new homes further in energy performance terms than the previous Zero Carbon Standard agreed by the 2010-15 coalition Government (which in broad terms would have seen a 25 per cent improvement on Part L 2013). The Future Homes Standard would then deliver a final step in performance in 2025. Critically though, restarting the journey
to zero carbon needs to be placed in the context of hard-learned lessons from previ- ous pushes on sustainability and take into account the implications of a significant acceleration in renewable generative capac-
ity that is rapidly decarbonising the grid. We must not forget just how difficult the
industry as a whole found the practical journey to achieving genuine Code Level 3 and 4 performance. The Zero Carbon Hub, amongst others, undertook extensive evalu- ation of the gap between design and actual performance and there is compelling evidence that the shortfall could be much greater than the theoretical benefits deliv- ered by pushing efficiency much harder. In other words, focusing on industry’s
ability to deliver performance is at least as important as setting higher standards. To do so, the consultation suggests more wide- ranging and important changes than on energy efficiency alone. One of the main, but often overlooked
reasons for such poor performance was that the industry wasn’t just attempting to build new homes to a higher standard, but was in real terms trying to meet six or seven differ- ent standards on different sites at the same time. The same sub-contractors would jump from a Part L 2006 site to a Code 6 site, from a Code 3 site to Part L 2010 site, to Part L 2013 and then back to a Code 4 site. In London and elsewhere, further additional uplifts above the applicable Part L standard could be applied through planning policies. Pushing for higher standards was impor-
tant and well intentioned, and arguably justified in the absence of central Government pulling out the stops to do more on climate change. But we must learn from the negative impact of the previous fragmented application of standards if we are to achieve the right outcomes in the shortest possible period of time.
IN COMBINATION, THESE MEASURES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO SUPPORT INDUSTRY IN MAKING MUCH BIGGER STRIDES IN DELIVERING GENUINE AS- BUILT PERFORMANCE
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52