search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4 INDUSTRY NEWS


HOUSEBUILDER & DEVELOPER


Joint Publisher Anthony Parker


James Parker


FROM THE EDITOR


The Ministry of Housing has gone all out with its combustible cladding ban. Following its initial announcement in the summer, details of the scope of the ban recently emerged, namely that it covers all materials except those which achieve a European Classification of A1 or ‘A2-s2,d0’.


The Government has tried to take a tough approach, given the unimaginable horrors that unfolded at Grenfell Tower. However, whether such a blanket ban is going to be the answer, is hard to say. While removing all but the most fire resistant materials from the equation in terms of wall construction is certainly going to make a big difference to safety, fires can obviously occur in a variety of different internal areas, and still spread throughout the building if design and installation practice is not done rigorously.


ON THE COVER


Spitfire triumphs with Gold Award for Clevedon Hall Estate development


12.18


HOUSEBUILDER & DEVELOPER


Ministry of Housing Figures show big boost in housing delivery numbers


Developer survey shows Brexit fears and tax woes top list of industry concerns in 2018


The Government has, since the announcement, provided an impact assessment of the legislation change on developers, over the next 10 years. It found that they would be needing to find between £249m and £337m over the period to address the changes in specification required.


While this is bad news given the manifest cost pressures, the good news is that where councils are now going to be allowed to strip banned cladding from existing buildings, they will be able to recoup the cost of replacement from private landlords.


BERKELEY’S RIVERFRONT VIEWS The developer on how a 5,000+ home scheme in Woolwich puts regeneration in focus


Waterfront at Royal Arsenal Riverside go to page 22


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


There is a long way to go in overhauling the system, and the Government is commendably taking the bull by the horns. But does it really have the stomach for what will be a multi-faceted and bloody fight for better quality standards?


James Parker


Whether focusing on the exterior, and in such a sledgehammer fashion, is the right answer, is up for debate. A demonstrable signal that the Government was not pussyfooting around was politically necessary, but arguably a root and branch review of the Building Regulations themselves and their interpretation is what is practically necessary to foster broad change. This is far harder of course than targeting one highly visible element, which is why Dame Judith Hackitt only went as far as proposing a new Duty Holder role to enforce quality, and criticising the industry culture that means there is little accountability currently in terms of applying and enforcing Regs in many cases. What has happened to implementing her recommendation? This is one of several remaining questions, which Secretary of State James Brokenshire needs to answer.


Another is that while draconian in one sense, the ban also only extends to buildings of 18 metres and above. So are the same problems with specification going to occur in what are still fairly tall buildings below that height?


Managing Editor James Parker


Assistant Editor Jack Wooler


Editorial Assistant Roseanne Field


Senior Sales Executives Sheehan Edmonds Nathan Hunt


Sales Executives Suzanne Easter Kim Friend


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistants Georgia Musson Kimberley Musson


Audience Development Manager Jane Spice


Managing Director Simon Reed


Cointronic House, Station Road, Heathfield, East Sussex TN21 8DF


Advertising & administration Tel: 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.eu www.hbdonline.co.uk


Editorial features Tel: 01435 863500 jparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Press releases editorial@netmagmedia.eu


The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of- Custody certified supplier operating within environmental systems certified to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production.


Subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p.


All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, me- chanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Housebuilder & Developer, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illus- trate their products.


Printed in England


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52