This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BLADE INSPECTION & REPAIR


FEATURE SPONSOR


CUTTING COSTS IN PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS KEY


With more than 1,300 offshore wind turbines off the UK coast and sufficient energy to power three million homes generated in the last five years, the offshore industry is fast establishing itself as a viable energy source. By 2030 there are plans that 35% of the UK electricity demand will be met by offshore wind but cutting costs in production and maintenance is key.


“The industry needs to innovate as advances in technology will help reduce the costs of offshore wind,” says Steve Ross, Managing Director – GEV Wind Power. “Time efficient and cost effective repair and maintenance programmes will ensure the longevity of turbines and maximum return on investment.”


LEADING EDGE EROSION Leading edge erosion is incredibly costly to a developer as it reduces the turbine’s efficiency and reliability. Blades with no protective coating can show the first signs of wear within two years and even the smallest scratch is a weak link in productivity so should be considered as necessary maintenance.


“In 2015, we became the first contractor to be trained by BASF with its BASF RELEST leading edge protection system,” adds Steve. “This two-part paint technology offers four times higher resistance than conventional solutions and is designed to bear extreme conditions to provide significantly improved erosion and corrosion protection, thereby offering immeasurable savings in maintenance.”


MAINTENANCE PRACTICES Scheduled maintenance costs are relatively low, however studies have shown that unscheduled maintenance for baseline windfarms of 4-10MW turbines, constitutes around 65% of O&M costs.


Steve continues: “Our new fixed-price maintenance plans provides developers with the security of a scheduled maintenance programme, at pre-agreed costs.”


Utilising panoblade camera systems, offers further cost savings as it enables the rapid capture of high resolution images from an entire turbine blade surface and shares these via a web-based platform. GEV technicians are then able to identify the blade that requires priority maintenance and as only one operator is required to inspect the turbines, the system offers both exceptional savings in time and money.


“We used this cost saving technology extensively in the field during 2015 and typically achieved the inspection of over 70 offshore wind turbines in three weeks,” adds Steve. “It can inspect up to five onshore or three offshore turbines per day.”


GUARANTEED REPAIR TIMES


The company is also able to provide guaranteed repair times by deploying its patented wind habitat structure which mitigates


many of the environmental restrictions causing the delays in repairing blade damage. The wind habitat is easily retrofitted to most blade access platform solutions.


“Technology solutions that optimise and provide cost savings are essential to the long-term future of the offshore renewables sector,” concludes Steve. “As the UK becomes a hub for the industry the potential for UK innovators is huge.


“Announcements confirming Galloper, East Anglia ONE and the submission by Scottish Power Renewables for East Anglia THREE reinforces the commitment of the industry’s major players. It is now up to technology and O&M companies, large and small, to realise and seize the opportunity they have been presented.”


GEV Wind Power


48


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92