JURISDICTION REPORT: JAPAN
THE USE OF STANDARD CHARACTERS FOR A ‘WELL-KNOWN’ TRADEMARK
Ryo Maruyama Kyosei International Patent Office
Te Japanese Patent Office (JPO’s) Trademark Appeal Board has rendered a decision that a trademark application filed by our firm should be registered on the grounds that the applied-for trademark has become well-known among consumers through use by the applicant, based on Trademark Law Article 3(2).
Tis case relates to an application in which the trademark is the house mark of a famous confectionery company in Hokkaido. Te case started in 2008, when the company filed a trademark application with the JPO using the system that allows a trademark using standard characters to be registered.
Trademark registration using standard characters is the system in which an applied-for trademark is registered under the following conditions: (i) a trademark to be filed for registration is formed by characters only; (ii) the applicant does not file a special request regarding the appearance of the applied-for trademark; and (iii) the applied-for trademark can be registered using the characters with a typeface that was designated and publicised in advance by the JPO commissioner. Under this system a word mark can be registered without having to include a specific typeface of the characters such as Gothic or Ming-style type.
However, the initial application (Japanese Trademark Application No. 2008- 9879), in which the trademark ‘Hori’ (formed by standard characters) was filed, was rejected by the JPO on the grounds that the applied-for trademark is composed of nothing more than the letters Hori, which represents in Roman letters the common Japanese family name ‘堀 ’ written in normal characters, and therefore, Trademark Law Article 3(1)(iv) is applicable to the applied-for trademark.
Te applicant filed an appeal. Te JPO’s Appeal Board supported the examiner’s decision (Trial No. 2009-4733) even though it accepted our argument (to which Trademark Law Article 3[2] is to be applied) that the applied-for trademark has become well-known due to the use of the mark by the applicant.
Te reason the board supported the original decision was as follows: the applied-for trademark formed by standard characters is different from the trademark the applicant actually uses, in typeface and appearance, and therefore the applied-for trademark is not the same as the trademark that is used. In other words, the board does not acknowledge that the applied-for trademark is the same as the used trademark, which is the requirement for applying Trademark Law Article 3(2).
Aſter consultation with our client, we filed another trademark application, in which the applied-for trademark used a bolder Gothic type so as to be the same as the actually used trademark (Japanese Trademark Application
www.worldipreview.com
“WE CONSIDERED THAT THE EXAMINER’S DECISION WAS INCORRECT BECAUSE, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE NEW APPLICATION WAS FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD’S PREVIOUS RULING, THE EXAMINER IGNORED IT.”
No. 2010-14921), and also argued that the applied-for trademark is well- known due to use by the applicant. However, the examiner did not accept our argument, and again rejected the application.
We considered that the examiner’s decision was incorrect because, despite the fact that the new application was filed in accordance with the board’s previous ruling, the examiner ignored it. We again filed an appeal to cancel the decision (Trial No. 2011-25944), and the Appeal Board at last decided that the applied-for trademark should be registered aſter we submitted a great deal of evidence to support the claim that the applied-for trademark has become well-known due to use by the applicant.
Reviewing the process that led to final registration of the trademark, we agree that it is necessary to evaluate precisely whether or not an applied- for trademark is the same as a trademark that is actually used, in order to determine whether the applied-for trademark has become well-known through use. However, throughout this process, we have felt that the JPO’s decisions contradict the rules of registering a trademark using standard characters.
In view of the fact that many rulings that put importance on the ‘actual state of transaction of goods’ covered by a trademark have been issued when determining similarities between trademarks, we have to say that the reason for the existence of the ‘standard characters’ system has been undermined and its merits have been diminished.
Ryo Maruyama is a Japanese patent attorney and vice president of Kyosei International Patent Office. He can be contacted at:
info@kyosei.or.jp
World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2012 63
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84