P
rocess improvement measures are making a diff erence in ICU patient experience. In hospitals such as Park-
land Health & Hospital System in Dallas, nurses are leading the way. “T is has already transformed ICU care and
it’s becoming the standard of care,” said Katie Mapula, MSN, RN, CCRN, a quality improve- ment manager at Parkland, where the ICU nurses are midway through an SICU process improvement project. Since the Society of Critical Care Medicine published the “Clinical
Katie Mapula, RN
Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit” in 2013, implementation of the concept of ICU Liberation has been improving management of patients’ course of care and reducing ICU stays.
Addressing pain, agitation, delirium ICU Liberation addresses the three top issues experienced by ICU patients: pain, agitation and delirium, which are managed through best practice bundles. Natalie Provenzale, RN, who is a quality
improvement manager at Parkland, said after establishing groups to tackle the bundles, the nurse groups each decided how to develop their part of the process improve- ment project. Bundles are groupings of best practice nursing assessments and treatments to reduce patients’ delirium, improve pain management and reduce long-term consequences.
lessens. “What we can prove is bundle adherence—nurses following the new best practices,” Mapula said. “And we can’t talk about one part [of PAD change] without talking about the whole thing,” she said. “T e components are intertwined.”
Delirium issues In checking for bundle adherence for delirium, it became clear through chart reviews that nurses were charting improperly, according to Mapula. “We didn’t understand how to do a proper confusion assessment for delirium, so we realized we needed better education,” Mapula said. After instruction in the confusion assessment method — a modifi cation of the quick delirium assessment done regularly at the bedside — nurses more readily identify delirium and can better manage it, she said. Management has included altering room lighting. “We know
patients do better when exposed to natural sunlight and full room lights, so we have all the window blinds up at 6 a.m. and the room lights on,” Provenzale said. “This setting mimics natural sleep and wake cycles, which lowers the patients’ delirium.”
Natalie Provenzale, RN
(DUO\ PRELOLW\ EHQHƮ WV Mapula said early mobility is one component where nurses knew they could use the bundle to elicit change. SICU staff has benefited by using the early mobility program developed in Parkland’s MICU. “It gave us great headway,” Provenzale said. “That was a great early win that’s helped to get everyone on board. If you know that your patient is going to have a harder time walking due to delirium and pain, let’s focus on improving their ability to mobilize.” While hard data is unavailable currently to prove change is occurring, the nurses have observed that as early mobilization rates rise, PAD
18 Visit us at
NURSE.com • 2016
Overcoming challenges Engaging all 104 unit RNs with the process improvement project and promoting bundle adherence was a challenge, said Stacey Barker, RN, SICU associate unit manager. Project leaders came up with bundle champions, 29 SICU nurses who are responsible for a diff erent element of the process improvement, according to Barker. “T ey’re the ones who are leading the project,” she said. Another success highlight has been the physician-nurse-family collab-
Stacey Barker, RN
oration at the bedside. Nurses feel they have a voice and are more comfortable expressing their thoughts on the care plan. Being nurse-driven has made Parkland SICU’s process improvement
successful, according to Barker. “T is is the biggest takeaway: getting the staff to buy in and letting them own it,” she said. “It’s changing ICU culture and I believe it will change the whole hospital culture.” •
Karen Schmidt, RN, is a freelance writer. FOR MORE, VISIT
Nurse.com/ICU-Liberation.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46
