Congregations in the community Photo courtesy of Luther Place Memorial Church
Ministry with neighbors
Working with the Washington Interfaith Network, Carol Ann Newgent (left) and Amanda Lindamood go door-to-door in their ward to find out what issues people care about and to increase voter turnout in the upcoming election.
F
our summers ago, Luther Place Memorial Church in Washington, D.C., developed an
arts-based summer camp for Latino families. Intentional listening in their neighborhood connected the congregation with parents and members who planned, dreamed and ultimately led a successful camp that continues today. The idea of doing ministry with neighbors
as opposed to doing service for them has been embedded in this congregation’s way of operating from its beginnings, said its pastor, Karen Brau. Because of this, a less hierarchical leadership model emerged at Luther Place. This year the congregation will add a worship component to its camp, realizing the dreams of a core group of members and neighborhood leaders. Luther Place is part of a historically working-
class community that is now changing in economics and demographics. Those moving in are mostly young, affluent Caucasians, but there are still significant numbers of Latino immigrants and African-Americans who traditionally have lived there. For longtime residents, the pace of development means less affordability, disappearing community institutions and an inability to benefit from the fruits of development. Brau said a prevailing cultural trend promotes a
rapid pace, independence-oriented, do-it-yourself approach in this area, but this doesn’t build community or the body of Christ. Instead it tends to perpetuate white privilege and racial inequity in terms of who makes decisions and who is at the center of communal life, she said. This is where the congregation’s adherence to the principles of community organizing comes into play. Luther Place doesn’t want to lose the vibrancy
of its neighborhood, nor do members want their neighbors’ access to the abundant life that God intends to be compromised. So they seek relationships and partner with people being pushed to the margins. They also know that relating to and
18 AUGUST 2016
engaging with new residents is part of God’s call to the church. These challenges led the congregation to begin leadership development and intentional listening campaigns. One of those partners is resident Silvia Inez
Salazar. “When my affordable housing co-op achieved our goal of purchasing our building, we realized that gentrification in Logan Circle had quickly passed us by. For the 83 diverse working families that have lived in the building for decades, we questioned whether or not we still belonged in the neighborhood,” she said. “Along the way we were blessed enough to meet members of Luther Place ... and explored ways to partner and reaffirm our sense of belonging. “Events such as SoulFiesta, summer camp,
holiday celebrations and the craft collective proved instrumental in our organizing work. We now have a renewed sense of community fellowship and are partnering with Luther Place on organizing a child care cooperative that is led by Latina immigrants.” In her work, Brau said she adheres to the
prophetic tradition that runs throughout Scripture, in which Jesus also operated. “True prophets are always exposed to conflict. Organizing provides guidance through such times,” she said. “Organizing fosters a community of prophets that identify with a particular time and place around which they are operating. But while prophets often can be right, making something new and good happen out of the truth they proclaim, that’s harder. That’s what organizing gives us the capacity to do.” The congregation plans to continue organizing
around immigration issues and their neighbors’ legal status, struggles that limit people’s access to basic and quality-of-life resources. They also will continue working through the Washington Interfaith Network (WIN)—their community organizing group—which is addressing homelessness and the lack of affordable housing in the area.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52