FEATURE EMISSIONS MONITORING A SMARTER WAY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE
According to Cemtek Environmental, properly designed continuous emission monitoring systems can simplify regulatory compliance and reduce costs
P
etrochemical refineries are increasingly being called on to install
continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) to collect, record and report data to comply with air emission legislation. Spurring this requirement are stricter regulations, often stimulated by air quality districts, which expand the types and capacities of equipment, as well as the addition of chemical compounds, that must be monitored. In addition, facilities with decades-old monitoring systems are now facing the need to retrofit or replace obsolete components. This is putting a spotlight on CEMS, as
refineries eager to keep costs down wrestle with how to meet compliance requirements as inexpensively and efficiently as possible, while still protecting the facility against regulatory fines. They are also keen to keep plant personnel on higher revenue generating priorities and off maintenance and operational duties. “CEMS are used for environmental
compliance only. They do not make the refinery money,” said Bill Deutschlander of Eichleay, a full service, multi-discipline facilities design and engineering firm for petrochemical and other industries. “So the least amount of money you can spend on the system and remain compliant is in the refinery’s best interest.” The difficulty with that concept, says Deutschlander, is that a poorly designed CEM system with the least expensive components can cost much more in the long run in ongoing upkeep and maintenance. “A lot of [CEMS] providers want to
purchase the lowest-priced equipment to install in their system,” added Deutschlander. “That might get you a lower installed cost, but you want quality system components so you minimise the amount of maintenance required.” In addition, if the system fails to record
data, even for short periods of time or is not properly validated every 24 hours, regulators can levy significant penalties against the facility that can be costly. Housed in shelters in close proximity to each piece of equipment monitored, CEM systems continuously transport samples of exhaust gases that have been conditioned to a rack of analyzers. Reporting software is also included, and the entire system is often tied into the
28 NOVEMBER 2016 | PROCESS & CONTROL
refinery’s network. CEMS use probes, analyzers, pumps, chillers and other components available on the open market. As such creating these types of systems is a matter of integrating a variety of products from different manufacturers. Once integrated, by EPA rule, CEMS
must be validated once every 24 hours to ensure the analyzer has not drifted off its calibrated accuracy by more than typically 10%. CEMS operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and must have a minimum uptime to stay in compliance and avoid fines. For these reasons, ongoing maintenance is unavoidable for facilities that expect to remain in compliance.
MEETING NEW GUIDELINES For example, for one refinery on the west-coast of America, new regulations necessitated the installation of CEM systems on four mid-sized process boilers previously monitored by more basic oxygen monitors. The new guidelines from the local air quality district addressed emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOX) and carbon dioxide (CO2) from boilers, steam generators, and process heaters. “We used to have different type of
measurements on these process heaters, but that was no longer acceptable to the Bay Area and we had to install a full- blown CEMS,” said Ken Sullivan, an engineer for analyzers and instrumentation at the refinery. According to Sullivan, the project was put out to bid and was ultimately awarded to Cemtek Environmental, a supplier of custom engineered CEMS. Cemtek is a system integrator of extractive, dilution and mercury CEMS designed to monitor compounds such as NOX, CO2, oxygen, sulphur and others. The refinery was already familiar with Cemtek, having worked with the company on several past projects. “They came in with the best proposal,”
said Sullivan. “In our experience, they really try and do the right thing for us. If you put a spec together and they have a better idea, they will point it out based on their past experience.” Sullivan adds that Cemtek installed and
completed initial testing of the system prior to the deadline and within cost. There is routine maintenance that has
Cemtek Environmental stresses the importance of high-quality, effective CEMS in order to simplify maintenance
to be done on these systems. Many plants find they must assign additional man hours to take care of the equipment. “If plant personnel have to spend more and more time on the CEMS, usually what that means is it’s going to take them away from working on profit generating equipment,” said Deutschlander. “So properly designed process analyzers will help them ultimately have a much higher return on the dollar by making the process more efficient.” Exacerbating the situation is the
continuing exodus of experienced personnel to retirement, leaving a younger generation of engineers with limited training on existing systems. “You’re seeing more outsourcing now because refineries don’t have enough personnel to do the maintenance,” said Deutschlander.
To address this, integrators like Cemtek
provide field service maintenance services. These can range from yearly visits to tune-up the system prior to annual re- certification, quarterly visits to maintain the system regularly, or even on-site services with daily technician visits. Technology will also play a key role in
reducing maintenance requirements. Today’s emission systems now deliver remote diagnostics that allow technicians to review how the system is operating and conduct preventative diagnostics through a web browser, removing the need for regular or unnecessary on-site visits. “The more information you can view
remotely will lower the total overall cost of maintenance,” concluded Deutschlander.
Cemtek Environmental
www.cemteks.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
